diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmad-master.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmad-master.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bac832f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmad-master.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'BMad Master — BMad Master Executor, Knowledge Custodian, and Workflow Orchestrator: runtime resource management, workflow orchestration, task execution, knowledge custodian'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/core/agents/bmad-master.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-analyst.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-analyst.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..25989fa6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-analyst.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'Mary — Business Analyst: market research, competitive analysis, requirements elicitation, domain expertise'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/analyst.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-architect.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-architect.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1f28c9a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-architect.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'Winston — Architect: distributed systems, cloud infrastructure, API design, scalable patterns'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/architect.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-dev.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-dev.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0d890684
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-dev.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'Amelia — Developer Agent: story execution, test-driven development, code implementation'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/dev.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-pm.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-pm.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..35eef5d7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-pm.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'John — Product Manager: PRD creation, requirements discovery, stakeholder alignment, user interviews'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/pm.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-qa.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-qa.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8a91cb4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-qa.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'Quinn — QA Engineer: test automation, API testing, E2E testing, coverage analysis'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/qa.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-quick-flow-solo-dev.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-quick-flow-solo-dev.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4887cc1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-quick-flow-solo-dev.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'Barry — Quick Flow Solo Dev: rapid spec creation, lean implementation, minimum ceremony'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/quick-flow-solo-dev.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-sm.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-sm.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..15cac3f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-sm.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'Bob — Scrum Master: sprint planning, story preparation, agile ceremonies, backlog management'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/sm.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-tech-writer.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-tech-writer.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d3c7f2ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-tech-writer.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'Paige — Technical Writer: documentation, Mermaid diagrams, standards compliance, concept explanation'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-ux-designer.agent.md b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-ux-designer.agent.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..99ed40e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/agents/bmad-agent-bmm-ux-designer.agent.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+description: 'Sally — UX Designer: user research, interaction design, UI patterns, experience strategy'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+You must fully embody this agent's persona and follow all activation instructions exactly as specified.
+
+<agent-activation CRITICAL="TRUE">
+1. LOAD the FULL agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/ux-designer.md
+2. READ its entire contents - this contains the complete agent persona, menu, and instructions
+3. FOLLOW every step in the <activation> section precisely
+4. DISPLAY the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. PRESENT the numbered menu
+6. WAIT for user input before proceeding
+</agent-activation>
diff --git a/.github/copilot-instructions.md b/.github/copilot-instructions.md
index 25251beb..1d699cda 100644
--- a/.github/copilot-instructions.md
+++ b/.github/copilot-instructions.md
@@ -1,65 +1,88 @@
-# Fantasy Map Generator
+<!-- BMAD:START -->
 
-Azgaar's Fantasy Map Generator is a client-only web application for creating fantasy maps. It generates detailed fantasy worlds with countries, cities, rivers, biomes, and cultural elements.
+# BMAD Method — Project Instructions
 
-Always reference these instructions first.
+## Project Configuration
 
-# Architecture
+- **Project**: Fantasy-Map-Generator
+- **User**: Azgaar
+- **Communication Language**: English
+- **Document Output Language**: English
+- **User Skill Level**: intermediate
+- **Output Folder**: {project-root}/\_bmad-output
+- **Planning Artifacts**: {project-root}/\_bmad-output/planning-artifacts
+- **Implementation Artifacts**: {project-root}/\_bmad-output/implementation-artifacts
+- **Project Knowledge**: {project-root}/docs
 
-The codebase is gradually transitioning from **vanilla JavaScript to TypeScript** while maintaining compatibility with the existing generation pipeline and legacy `.map` user files.
+## BMAD Runtime Structure
 
-The expected **future architecture** is based on a separation between **world data**, **procedural generation**, **interactive editing**, and **rendering**.
+- **Agent definitions**: `_bmad/bmm/agents/` (BMM module) and `_bmad/core/agents/` (core)
+- **Workflow definitions**: `_bmad/bmm/workflows/` (organized by phase)
+- **Core tasks**: `_bmad/core/tasks/` (help, editorial review, indexing, sharding, adversarial review)
+- **Core workflows**: `_bmad/core/workflows/` (brainstorming, party-mode, advanced-elicitation)
+- **Workflow engine**: `_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml` (executes YAML-based workflows)
+- **Module configuration**: `_bmad/bmm/config.yaml`
+- **Core configuration**: `_bmad/core/config.yaml`
+- **Agent manifest**: `_bmad/_config/agent-manifest.csv`
+- **Workflow manifest**: `_bmad/_config/workflow-manifest.csv`
+- **Help manifest**: `_bmad/_config/bmad-help.csv`
+- **Agent memory**: `_bmad/_memory/`
 
-The application is conceptually divided into four main layers:
+## Key Conventions
 
-- **State** — world data and style configuration, the single source of truth
-- **Generators** — procedural world simulation (model)
-- **Editors** — user-driven mutations of the world state (controllers)
-- **Renderer** — map visualization (view)
+- Always load `_bmad/bmm/config.yaml` before any agent activation or workflow execution
+- Store all config fields as session variables: `{user_name}`, `{communication_language}`, `{output_folder}`, `{planning_artifacts}`, `{implementation_artifacts}`, `{project_knowledge}`
+- MD-based workflows execute directly — load and follow the `.md` file
+- YAML-based workflows require the workflow engine — load `workflow.xml` first, then pass the `.yaml` config
+- Follow step-based workflow execution: load steps JIT, never multiple at once
+- Save outputs after EACH step when using the workflow engine
+- The `{project-root}` variable resolves to the workspace root at runtime
 
-Flow:
-settings → generators → world data → renderer
-UI → editors → world data → renderer
+## Available Agents
 
-### Layer responsibilities
+| Agent               | Persona     | Title                                                                | Capabilities                                                                             |
+| ------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| bmad-master         | BMad Master | BMad Master Executor, Knowledge Custodian, and Workflow Orchestrator | runtime resource management, workflow orchestration, task execution, knowledge custodian |
+| analyst             | Mary        | Business Analyst                                                     | market research, competitive analysis, requirements elicitation, domain expertise        |
+| architect           | Winston     | Architect                                                            | distributed systems, cloud infrastructure, API design, scalable patterns                 |
+| dev                 | Amelia      | Developer Agent                                                      | story execution, test-driven development, code implementation                            |
+| pm                  | John        | Product Manager                                                      | PRD creation, requirements discovery, stakeholder alignment, user interviews             |
+| qa                  | Quinn       | QA Engineer                                                          | test automation, API testing, E2E testing, coverage analysis                             |
+| quick-flow-solo-dev | Barry       | Quick Flow Solo Dev                                                  | rapid spec creation, lean implementation, minimum ceremony                               |
+| sm                  | Bob         | Scrum Master                                                         | sprint planning, story preparation, agile ceremonies, backlog management                 |
+| tech-writer         | Paige       | Technical Writer                                                     | documentation, Mermaid diagrams, standards compliance, concept explanation               |
+| ux-designer         | Sally       | UX Designer                                                          | user research, interaction design, UI patterns, experience strategy                      |
 
-**State (world data)**  
-Stores all map data and style configuration.  
-The data layer must contain **no logic and no rendering code**.
+## Slash Commands
 
-**Generators**  
-Implement the procedural world simulation and populate or update world data based on generation settings.
+Type `/bmad-` in Copilot Chat to see all available BMAD workflows and agent activators. Agents are also available in the agents dropdown.
 
-**Editors**  
-Implement interactive editing tools used by the user.  
-Editors perform controlled mutations of the world state and can be viewed as **interactive generators**.
+## Project Architecture: Critical Rules for All Agents
 
-**Renderer**  
-Converts the world state into **SVG or WebGL graphics**.  
-Rendering must be a **pure visualization step** and must **not modify world data**.
+### main.js globals — NEVER use globalThis
 
-# Working Effectively
+`public/main.js` and all `public/modules/**/*.js` files are **plain `<script defer>` tags — NOT ES modules**. Every top-level declaration is a `window` property automatically.
 
-The project uses **NPM**, **Vite**, and **TypeScript** for development and building.
+Key globals always available on `window` at runtime: `scale`, `viewX`, `viewY`, `graphWidth`, `graphHeight`, `svgWidth`, `svgHeight`, `pack`, `grid`, `viewbox`, `svg`, `zoom`, `seed`, `options`, `byId`, `rn`, `tip`, `layerIsOn` and many more.
 
-## Setup
+**Rule: In `src/**/\*.ts`(ES modules), just use the globals directly — they are declared as ambient globals in`src/types/global.ts`:\*\*
 
-Install dependencies: `npm install`
+```ts
+// ✅ CORRECT — declared in src/types/global.ts, use as bare identifiers
+buildCameraBounds(viewX, viewY, scale, graphWidth, graphHeight);
+viewbox.on("zoom.webgl", handler);
 
-Requirements: Node.js **>= 24.0.0**
+// ❌ WRONG — never do these
+(window as any).scale(globalThis as any).scale;
+```
 
-## Development
+Full reference: see `docs/architecture-globals.md`.
 
-Start the development server: `npm run dev`
+### Code Style — Non-Negotiable Rules for All Agents
 
-Access the application at: http://localhost:5173
+- **No unnecessary comments.** Code is self-documenting. Add a comment only when the _why_ is non-obvious from reading the code itself. Never describe what the code does.
+- **Clean abstractions that don't leak.** Each abstraction fully owns its concern. Callers must not need to know implementation details. If a caller must pass a flag to alter internal behavior, the abstraction is wrong — split it.
+- **No academic over-engineering.** No design patterns, extra layers, or wrapper objects unless the problem concretely requires them. Solve the current requirement; do not design for hypothetical future variants.
+- **Minimal artifacts.** Only create files mandated by acceptance criteria. No speculative utils stubs, barrel re-exports, or helper files without multiple concrete callers.
 
-## Build
-
-Create a production build: `npm run build`
-
-Build steps:
-
-1. TypeScript compilation (`tsc`)
-2. Vite build
-3. Output written to `dist/`
+<!-- BMAD:END -->
diff --git a/.github/copilot-instructions.md.bak b/.github/copilot-instructions.md.bak
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..25251beb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/copilot-instructions.md.bak
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# Fantasy Map Generator
+
+Azgaar's Fantasy Map Generator is a client-only web application for creating fantasy maps. It generates detailed fantasy worlds with countries, cities, rivers, biomes, and cultural elements.
+
+Always reference these instructions first.
+
+# Architecture
+
+The codebase is gradually transitioning from **vanilla JavaScript to TypeScript** while maintaining compatibility with the existing generation pipeline and legacy `.map` user files.
+
+The expected **future architecture** is based on a separation between **world data**, **procedural generation**, **interactive editing**, and **rendering**.
+
+The application is conceptually divided into four main layers:
+
+- **State** — world data and style configuration, the single source of truth
+- **Generators** — procedural world simulation (model)
+- **Editors** — user-driven mutations of the world state (controllers)
+- **Renderer** — map visualization (view)
+
+Flow:
+settings → generators → world data → renderer
+UI → editors → world data → renderer
+
+### Layer responsibilities
+
+**State (world data)**  
+Stores all map data and style configuration.  
+The data layer must contain **no logic and no rendering code**.
+
+**Generators**  
+Implement the procedural world simulation and populate or update world data based on generation settings.
+
+**Editors**  
+Implement interactive editing tools used by the user.  
+Editors perform controlled mutations of the world state and can be viewed as **interactive generators**.
+
+**Renderer**  
+Converts the world state into **SVG or WebGL graphics**.  
+Rendering must be a **pure visualization step** and must **not modify world data**.
+
+# Working Effectively
+
+The project uses **NPM**, **Vite**, and **TypeScript** for development and building.
+
+## Setup
+
+Install dependencies: `npm install`
+
+Requirements: Node.js **>= 24.0.0**
+
+## Development
+
+Start the development server: `npm run dev`
+
+Access the application at: http://localhost:5173
+
+## Build
+
+Create a production build: `npm run build`
+
+Build steps:
+
+1. TypeScript compilation (`tsc`)
+2. Vite build
+3. Output written to `dist/`
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-analyst.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-analyst.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..44216fdd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-analyst.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'Business Analyst'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/analyst.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-architect.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-architect.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..868f1d22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-architect.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'Architect'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/architect.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmad-master.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmad-master.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..05879b2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmad-master.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'BMad Master Executor, Knowledge Custodian, and Workflow Orchestrator'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/core/agents/bmad-master.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-check-implementation-readiness.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-check-implementation-readiness.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f42d1f2b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-check-implementation-readiness.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Check implementation readiness'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-code-review.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-code-review.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5de246ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-code-review.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Code review'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the workflow engine at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
+3. Load and execute the workflow configuration at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/code-review/workflow.yaml using the engine from step 2
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-correct-course.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-correct-course.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..70c08a9c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-correct-course.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Correct course'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the workflow engine at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
+3. Load and execute the workflow configuration at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/correct-course/workflow.yaml using the engine from step 2
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-architecture.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-architecture.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8812d25f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-architecture.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Create architecture'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-epics-and-stories.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-epics-and-stories.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4df3bf35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-epics-and-stories.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Create epics and stories'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-prd.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-prd.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5d77edf7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-prd.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Create PRD'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow-create-prd.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-product-brief.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-product-brief.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..472ace16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-product-brief.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Create product brief'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-story.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-story.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a6060e2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-story.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Validate story'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the workflow engine at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
+3. Load and execute the workflow configuration at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml using the engine from step 2
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-ux-design.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-ux-design.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c1514f7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-create-ux-design.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Create UX design'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-dev-story.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-dev-story.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..dacd363a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-dev-story.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Dev story'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the workflow engine at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
+3. Load and execute the workflow configuration at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/dev-story/workflow.yaml using the engine from step 2
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-document-project.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-document-project.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3a43660a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-document-project.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Document project'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the workflow engine at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
+3. Load and execute the workflow configuration at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/document-project/workflow.yaml using the engine from step 2
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-domain-research.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-domain-research.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ba634cde
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-domain-research.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Domain research'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/workflow-domain-research.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-edit-prd.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-edit-prd.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..923862e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-edit-prd.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Edit PRD'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow-edit-prd.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-explain-concept.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-explain-concept.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f0dbbbd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-explain-concept.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Explain concept'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.md and activate the Paige (Technical Writer) persona
+3. Execute the Explain Concept menu command (EC)
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-generate-project-context.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-generate-project-context.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4222706b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-generate-project-context.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Generate project context'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/generate-project-context/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-market-research.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-market-research.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4fde983e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-market-research.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Market research'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/workflow-market-research.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-mermaid-generate.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-mermaid-generate.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..05c82336
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-mermaid-generate.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Mermaid generate'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.md and activate the Paige (Technical Writer) persona
+3. Execute the Mermaid Generate menu command (MG)
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-qa-automate.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-qa-automate.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b3cd67ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-qa-automate.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'QA automation'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the workflow engine at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
+3. Load and execute the workflow configuration at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/qa-generate-e2e-tests/workflow.yaml using the engine from step 2
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-quick-dev.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-quick-dev.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a54115f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-quick-dev.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Quick dev'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-dev/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-quick-spec.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-quick-spec.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1a53fbee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-quick-spec.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Quick spec'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-retrospective.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-retrospective.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..dd7a0ccd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-retrospective.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Retrospective'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the workflow engine at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
+3. Load and execute the workflow configuration at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/retrospective/workflow.yaml using the engine from step 2
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-sprint-planning.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-sprint-planning.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..37bb818b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-sprint-planning.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Sprint planning'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the workflow engine at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
+3. Load and execute the workflow configuration at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/sprint-planning/workflow.yaml using the engine from step 2
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-sprint-status.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-sprint-status.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..06613228
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-sprint-status.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Sprint status'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the workflow engine at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml
+3. Load and execute the workflow configuration at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/sprint-status/workflow.yaml using the engine from step 2
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-technical-research.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-technical-research.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..53e49ec8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-technical-research.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Technical research'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/workflow-technical-research.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-update-standards.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-update-standards.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..dd1b7cdd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-update-standards.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Update standards'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.md and activate the Paige (Technical Writer) persona
+3. Execute the Update Standards menu command (US)
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-validate-document.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-validate-document.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..45ae1841
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-validate-document.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Validate document'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.md and activate the Paige (Technical Writer) persona
+3. Execute the Validate Document menu command (VD)
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-validate-prd.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-validate-prd.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c5ca19e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-validate-prd.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Validate PRD'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow-validate-prd.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-write-document.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-write-document.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d19e8f54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-bmm-write-document.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+description: 'Write document'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.md and activate the Paige (Technical Writer) persona
+3. Execute the Write Document menu command (WD)
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-brainstorming.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-brainstorming.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..1d036624
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-brainstorming.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Brainstorm ideas'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/brainstorming/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-dev.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-dev.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..84e804e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-dev.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'Developer Agent'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/dev.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-editorial-review-prose.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-editorial-review-prose.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fea1065b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-editorial-review-prose.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Editorial review prose'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and execute the task at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/editorial-review-prose.xml
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-editorial-review-structure.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-editorial-review-structure.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3a72035a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-editorial-review-structure.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Editorial review structure'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and execute the task at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/editorial-review-structure.xml
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-help.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-help.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..29bacc94
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-help.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'BMAD help'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/help.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-index-docs.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-index-docs.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7e53e685
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-index-docs.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Index documents'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and execute the task at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/index-docs.xml
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-party-mode.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-party-mode.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e73ddc51
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-party-mode.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Party mode'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and follow the workflow at {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-pm.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-pm.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..83047d4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-pm.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'Product Manager'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/pm.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-qa.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-qa.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e9199b85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-qa.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'QA Engineer'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/qa.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-quick-flow-solo-dev.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-quick-flow-solo-dev.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..954a9bd9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-quick-flow-solo-dev.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'Quick Flow Solo Dev'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/quick-flow-solo-dev.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-review-adversarial-general.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-review-adversarial-general.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f9a92be6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-review-adversarial-general.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Adversarial review'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and execute the task at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..19e31e62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-review-edge-case-hunter.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Edge Case Hunter Review'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and execute the task at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/review-edge-case-hunter.xml
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-shard-doc.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-shard-doc.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a318ef86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-shard-doc.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+description: 'Shard document'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load and execute the task at {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/shard-doc.xml
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-sm.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-sm.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4649891b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-sm.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'Scrum Master'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/sm.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-tech-writer.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-tech-writer.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6216491e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-tech-writer.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'Technical Writer'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/tech-writer/tech-writer.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.github/prompts/bmad-ux-designer.prompt.md b/.github/prompts/bmad-ux-designer.prompt.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f6535dec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/prompts/bmad-ux-designer.prompt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+description: 'UX Designer'
+agent: 'agent'
+tools: ['read', 'edit', 'search', 'execute']
+---
+
+1. Load {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and store ALL fields as session variables
+2. Load the full agent file from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/agents/ux-designer.md
+3. Follow ALL activation instructions in the agent file
+4. Display the welcome/greeting as instructed
+5. Present the numbered menu
+6. Wait for user input before proceeding
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1281a744..6c3e5f02 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,7 +6,4 @@
 /coverage
 /playwright-report
 /test-results
-/_bmad
-/_bmad-output
-.github/agents/bmad-*
-.github/prompts/bmad-*
\ No newline at end of file
+/.DS_Store
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/_bmad-output/brainstorming/brainstorming-session-2026-03-12-001.md b/_bmad-output/brainstorming/brainstorming-session-2026-03-12-001.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0f0e1045
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_bmad-output/brainstorming/brainstorming-session-2026-03-12-001.md
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+---
+stepsCompleted: [1, 2]
+inputDocuments:
+  - "_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/research/technical-WebGL-SVG-layered-rendering-research-2026-03-12.md"
+session_topic: "WebGL + SVG Layered Rendering Architecture for Relief Icons"
+session_goals: "Explore all viable approaches for achieving correct layer ordering when mixing WebGL (Three.js) and SVG rendering for the relief icons layer; specifically evaluate and expand on the multi-SVG/multi-DOM-element architecture; surface edge cases, risks, and non-obvious possibilities"
+selected_approach: "Progressive Technique Flow"
+techniques_used: []
+ideas_generated: []
+context_file: "_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/research/technical-WebGL-SVG-layered-rendering-research-2026-03-12.md"
+---
+
+# Brainstorming Session — WebGL Relief Icons Rendering Architecture
+
+**User:** Azgaar
+**Date:** 2026-03-12
+**Project:** Fantasy-Map-Generator
+
+---
+
+## Session Overview
+
+**Topic:** WebGL + SVG Layered Rendering Architecture — Relief Icons
+
+**Goals:**
+
+- Explore all viable approaches for mixing WebGL (Three.js) and SVG while preserving correct layer ordering
+- Thoroughly evaluate the "split into multiple DOM elements, one per layer" proposal
+- Surface edge cases, risks, performance characteristics, and non-obvious alternatives
+- Push the idea space far past the obvious before organizing
+
+### Core Problem Statement
+
+The relief icons layer is currently SVG. The proposed change renders it via Three.js WebGL for performance. Three approaches have been considered:
+
+1. **Canvas beside the SVG** — loses all layer interleaving (layers can't be placed between each other)
+2. **WebGL inside `<foreignObject>`** — correct layering, but catastrophically slow (FBO composite on every frame)
+3. **Split SVG into multiple DOM elements (1 per layer)** — some layers canvas/WebGL, some SVG, each independently moveable in the DOM to reconstruct layer order
+
+The user needs to explore Option 3 deeply and discover any other viable approaches.
+
+---
diff --git a/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/architecture.md b/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/architecture.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0850b0d7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/architecture.md
@@ -0,0 +1,865 @@
+---
+stepsCompleted:
+  [
+    "step-01-init",
+    "step-02-context",
+    "step-03-starter",
+    "step-04-decisions",
+    "step-05-patterns",
+    "step-06-structure",
+    "step-07-validation",
+    "step-08-complete"
+  ]
+inputDocuments:
+  - "_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md"
+  - "_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/research/technical-WebGL-SVG-layered-rendering-research-2026-03-12.md"
+  - "_bmad-output/project-context.md"
+workflowType: "architecture"
+project_name: "Fantasy-Map-Generator"
+user_name: "Azgaar"
+date: "2026-03-12"
+status: "complete"
+lastStep: 8
+completedAt: "2026-03-12"
+---
+
+# Architecture Decision Document — Fantasy-Map-Generator WebGL Layer Framework
+
+**Project:** Fantasy-Map-Generator
+**Author:** Azgaar (via Winston/Architect)
+**Date:** 2026-03-12
+**Status:** Complete — Ready for Implementation
+
+---
+
+## 1. Project Context Analysis
+
+### 1.1 Scope Summary
+
+This architecture addresses a **brownfield, isolated subsystem replacement** in FMG's rendering pipeline. The surface area is:
+
+- **New:** `WebGL2LayerFramework` TypeScript class (`src/modules/webgl-layer-framework.ts`)
+- **Refactored:** `src/renderers/draw-relief-icons.ts` — migrated to use the framework instead of ad-hoc context management
+- **Added:** Unit tests (`src/modules/webgl-layer-framework.test.ts`)
+- **Unchanged:** All 32 SVG layers, D3 data pipeline, `public/modules/` legacy JS, globe renderer, SVG export
+
+### 1.2 Functional Requirements Coverage
+
+| FR Category                          | Count | Architectural Component                                           |
+| ------------------------------------ | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| Framework Core (FR1–FR4)             | 4     | `WebGL2LayerFramework` class                                      |
+| Coordinate Sync (FR5–FR7)            | 3     | `syncTransform()` method + orthographic camera                    |
+| Layer Lifecycle (FR8–FR11)           | 4     | `setVisible()`, `ResizeObserver`, `dispose()`                     |
+| Relief Rendering (FR12–FR17)         | 6     | `draw-relief-icons.ts` refactored                                 |
+| Compatibility & Fallback (FR18–FR19) | 2     | `detectWebGL2()` guard in framework init                          |
+| Interaction (FR20–FR21)              | 2     | `pointer-events: none` on canvas; existing Layers panel unchanged |
+| Developer API (FR22–FR24)            | 3     | `register(config)` public method                                  |
+| Testability (FR25–FR27)              | 3     | Pure functions / injectable dependencies                          |
+
+**Total: 27 FRs — all addressed.**
+
+### 1.3 Non-Functional Constraints Shaping Architecture
+
+| NFR                                             | Architectural Impact                                                                        |
+| ----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| NFR-P6: No GPU teardown on hide                 | `setVisible(false)` must set `mesh.visible = false` only — NOT call `dispose()`             |
+| NFR-C3: Max 2 WebGL contexts (1 globe + 1 map)  | Single `THREE.WebGLRenderer` shared across all registered layers                            |
+| NFR-M3: Global Module Pattern                   | `window.WebGL2LayerFramework = new WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass()` at module bottom            |
+| NFR-B1/B2: Bundle size ≤ 50KB gzip increase     | Three.js already present; named imports only (`import { WebGLRenderer, ... } from 'three'`) |
+| NFR-M5: ≥ 80% Vitest coverage on framework core | Pure coordinate functions and registration API must be injected/mockable                    |
+
+### 1.4 Critical Brownfield Constraints Discovered in Codebase
+
+| Constraint                        | Detail                                                                                | Architectural Response                                                               |
+| --------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| Existing WebGL relief renderer    | `draw-relief-icons.ts` already has a working Three.js renderer                        | Framework wraps/extends it — not replace from scratch                                |
+| `undrawRelief` tears down GPU     | Current implementation disposes renderer on hide — violates NFR-P6                    | Framework `setVisible(false)` replaces teardown pattern                              |
+| Canvas placement is wrong         | Currently `insertAdjacentElement("afterend", map)` — canvas sits above all SVG layers | Framework uses positioned wrapper; MVP uses z-index above SVG (see Decision 3)       |
+| Globals `viewX`, `viewY`, `scale` | Coordinate sync uses raw window globals                                               | Framework abstracts to `syncTransform()` callable function; tests inject mock values |
+| `#map { position: absolute }`     | SVG has no positioned parent container                                                | Framework wraps SVG in `#map-container` on init                                      |
+
+---
+
+## 2. Technology Stack
+
+No new dependencies are introduced. The framework uses only technologies already in the project:
+
+| Technology | Version  | Role in This Feature                                        |
+| ---------- | -------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
+| TypeScript | ^5.9.3   | Framework implementation language                           |
+| Three.js   | ^0.183.2 | WebGL renderer, orthographic camera, scene management       |
+| Vite       | ^7.3.1   | Bundling (tree-shaking Three.js named imports)              |
+| Vitest     | ^4.0.18  | Unit tests for coordinate sync and framework API            |
+| D3         | ^7.9.0   | Source of zoom transform values (`viewX`, `viewY`, `scale`) |
+
+**Three.js imports used (tree-shaken):**
+
+```typescript
+import {
+  WebGLRenderer,
+  Scene,
+  OrthographicCamera,
+  BufferGeometry,
+  BufferAttribute,
+  Mesh,
+  MeshBasicMaterial,
+  TextureLoader,
+  SRGBColorSpace,
+  LinearMipmapLinearFilter,
+  LinearFilter,
+  DoubleSide
+} from "three";
+```
+
+---
+
+## 3. Core Architectural Decisions
+
+### Decision 1: Single Shared WebGL Context via `WebGL2LayerFramework`
+
+**Decision:** A new `WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass` TypeScript module manages a single `THREE.WebGLRenderer` instance shared by all registered WebGL layers. It replaces `draw-relief-icons.ts`'s module-level renderer with a centralized framework.
+
+**Rationale:**
+
+- Browser WebGL context limit (8–16 per page) requires minimizing context creation
+- The globe renderer already holds context #1; the map framework holds context #2 — this is the budget maximum (NFR-C3)
+- A single `THREE.Scene` with `renderOrder` per layer handles draw ordering within the shared context
+- The existing `draw-relief-icons.ts` will be refactored to register with this framework instead of managing its own renderer
+
+**Alternatives rejected:**
+
+- One canvas per layer: would exceed context limit at 3+ WebGL layers
+- Raw WebGL2 without Three.js: Three.js already present; adds no bundle cost; handles context loss/restore, shader compilation, VBO management
+
+### Decision 2: Layer Registration API
+
+**Decision:** The framework exposes a `register(config: WebGLLayerConfig)` method. Callers provide an `id`, `anchorLayerId` (SVG element ID for z-position reference), `renderOrder`, a `setup(group)` callback (called once on init), a per-frame `render(group)` callback (called every frame before `renderer.render()`), and a `dispose(group)` cleanup callback. All three callbacks receive the layer's framework-managed `THREE.Group` — **never the raw scene, renderer, or camera** — establishing a clean abstraction boundary.
+
+**Abstraction boundary:** `THREE.Group` is the sole interface point between framework internals and layer logic. If the underlying renderer backend changes, only the framework changes — layer code is unaffected. Layer authors never import or depend on `THREE.Scene`, `THREE.WebGLRenderer`, or camera types.
+
+```typescript
+export interface WebGLLayerConfig {
+  id: string;
+  anchorLayerId: string; // SVG <g> id; canvas element id derived as `${id}Canvas`
+  renderOrder: number; // Three.js renderOrder for this layer's Group in the scene
+  setup: (group: THREE.Group) => void; // called once after WebGL2 confirmed; add meshes to group
+  render: (group: THREE.Group) => void; // called each frame before renderer.render(); update uniforms/geometry
+  dispose: (group: THREE.Group) => void; // called on unregister(id); dispose all GPU objects in group
+}
+```
+
+**What the framework manages:**
+
+- Canvas element creation, sizing, positioning; canvas `id` = `${config.id}Canvas`
+- `THREE.WebGLRenderer` + `THREE.Scene` + `THREE.OrthographicCamera` initialization
+- One `THREE.Group` per registered layer (owns all layer GPU objects)
+- Z-index derivation from anchor SVG layer DOM position
+- Visibility toggle (`group.visible = false/true`) — no GPU teardown
+- Canvas resize via `ResizeObserver`
+- D3 zoom subscription in `init()` → `requestRender()` on every zoom/pan event
+- Per-frame dispatch: calls each visible layer's `render(group)` before `renderer.render(scene, camera)`
+
+**What each layer module manages:**
+
+- In `setup(group)`: create `THREE.Mesh` / `BufferGeometry` / textures, add them to `group`
+- In `render(group)`: update geometry or material uniforms if data changed since last frame
+- In `dispose(group)`: call `.geometry.dispose()`, `.material.dispose()`, `.map?.dispose()` on all children
+- **Never** access `scene`, `renderer`, `camera`, or `canvas` directly — those are framework internals
+
+### Decision 3: Canvas Z-Index Positioning — MVP vs. Phase 2
+
+**MVP Decision:** The canvas is inserted as a sibling to `#map` in `#map-container` (a new `position: relative` wrapper div). The z-index is computed from the anchor SVG layer's page position in the DOM stack.
+
+**Known limitation:** Because all 32 SVG layers are inside `#map` (a single SVG element), CSS z-index cannot interleave the canvas between SVG layer groups. In MVP, the canvas renders **above the entire SVG** (higher z-index than `#map`). SVG layers that should visually overlay terrain icons (religion fills, borders, labels) will appear underneath the canvas.
+
+**Why this is acceptable for MVP:**
+
+- The visual impact is limited: relief icons appear in terrain cells (mountains, forests), while labels/burg icons appear in civilized cells — overlap is uncommon in practice
+- The current codebase ALREADY exhibits this same behavior (`draw-relief-icons.ts` places canvas after `#map` in DOM order with no z-index)
+- `pointer-events: none` preserves all interaction; the UX regression is purely visual
+
+### Decision 4: D3 Zoom → WebGL Orthographic Camera Sync
+
+**Decision:** The sync formula from the existing `draw-relief-icons.ts` is extracted into a pure, testable function `buildCameraBounds(viewX, viewY, scale, graphWidth, graphHeight)` that returns `{left, right, top, bottom}` for the orthographic camera.
+
+**Derivation (documented in code):**
+
+```
+D3 applies transform: translate(viewX, viewY) scale(scale) to #viewbox
+This means: screen_point = map_point * scale + (viewX, viewY)
+Inverting: map_point = (screen_point - (viewX, viewY)) / scale
+
+Orthographic camera bounds (what map rectangle is visible on screen):
+  left   = -viewX / scale          ← left edge of visible map
+  right  = (graphWidth - viewX) / scale  ← right edge
+  top    = -viewY / scale          ← top edge
+  bottom = (graphHeight - viewY) / scale ← bottom edge
+
+Three.js OrthographicCamera(left, right, top, bottom, near, far):
+  `top`    = upper visible edge in camera space (numerically smaller — closer to y=0 in SVG)
+  `bottom` = lower visible edge in camera space (numerically larger)
+  So top < bottom, which means the camera's Y-axis points downward — matching SVG.
+  new OrthographicCamera(left, right, top, bottom, -1, 1)
+  // top < bottom: Y-down matches SVG; origin at top-left of map.
+  // Do NOT swap top/bottom or negate — this is the correct Three.js Y-down configuration.
+```
+
+**Why this is testable:** `buildCameraBounds` takes only numbers and returns numbers. Tests inject mock `viewX/viewY/scale` values and assert exact output — no DOM or WebGL required.
+
+### Decision 5: Visibility Toggle — GPU State Preservation
+
+**Decision:** `framework.setVisible(id, visible)` toggles the Three.js `Object3D.visible` property of the layer's registered group. The canvas element's `display` style is changed only when ALL registered layers are hidden.
+
+```typescript
+setVisible(id: string, visible: boolean): void {
+  const layer = this.layers.get(id);
+  if (!layer) return;
+  layer.group.visible = visible;
+  // Only hide canvas if ALL layers are invisible (avoids GPU context loss)
+  const anyVisible = [...this.layers.values()].some(l => l.group.visible);
+  this.canvas.style.display = anyVisible ? "block" : "none";
+  if (visible) this.render();
+}
+```
+
+**This replaces `undrawRelief`'s current behavior** which calls `renderer.dispose()`, `scene = null`, etc. — destroying GPU buffers on every hide. The framework never destroys buffers except on `framework.unregister(id)`.
+
+### Decision 6: WebGL2 Detection and SVG Fallback
+
+**Decision:** `init()` calls `detectWebGL2()` which attempts `canvas.getContext('webgl2')`. On failure, the framework sets a private `_fallback` backing field to `true` (exposed via a public getter `get hasFallback()`). The relief renderer reads `hasFallback` and falls back to `drawSvg()`. All framework methods silently return when `_fallback` is true.
+
+**Critical TypeScript pattern — `hasFallback` MUST use a backing field, not `readonly`:** TypeScript `readonly` fields can only be assigned in the constructor. Because `detectWebGL2()` runs inside `init()` (called post-construction), `hasFallback` must be implemented as:
+
+```typescript
+private _fallback = false;
+get hasFallback(): boolean { return this._fallback; }
+
+init(): boolean {
+  this._fallback = !detectWebGL2();
+  if (this._fallback) return false;
+  // ... rest of init
+}
+```
+
+Do **not** declare `readonly hasFallback: boolean = false` — that pattern compiles but the assignment in `init()` produces a type error.
+
+```typescript
+// Exported for testability — accepts an injectable probe canvas
+export function detectWebGL2(probe?: HTMLCanvasElement): boolean {
+  const canvas = probe ?? document.createElement("canvas");
+  const ctx = canvas.getContext("webgl2");
+  if (!ctx) return false;
+  const ext = ctx.getExtension("WEBGL_lose_context");
+  ext?.loseContext();
+  return true;
+}
+```
+
+**Testable:** `detectWebGL2` accepts an optional injectable probe canvas so tests pass a mock without DOM access.
+
+### Decision 7: Frame Rendering — On-Demand, RAF-Coalesced
+
+**Decision:** The framework exposes a `requestRender()` method that coalesces calls within a single animation frame, preventing redundant GPU draws during rapid pan/zoom events.
+
+```typescript
+private rafId: number | null = null;
+
+requestRender(): void {
+  if (this.rafId !== null) return;
+  this.rafId = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
+    this.rafId = null;
+    this.render();
+  });
+}
+
+private render(): void {
+  this.syncTransform();
+  // Dispatch per-frame callback to each visible layer before submitting draw call.
+  // This is the mechanism through which layers update uniforms, instance matrices,
+  // or geometry data on a frame-by-frame basis.
+  for (const [, layer] of this.layers) {
+    if (layer.group.visible) {
+      layer.config.render(layer.group);
+    }
+  }
+  this.renderer.render(this.scene, this.camera);
+}
+```
+
+This replaces `window.rerenderReliefIcons` which currently does the same RAF coalescing at the module level.
+
+### Decision 8: ResizeObserver for Canvas Sizing
+
+**Decision:** The framework attaches a `ResizeObserver` to the `#map-container` element. On resize, it updates canvas dimensions and the orthographic camera aspect ratio, then re-renders.
+
+```typescript
+private observeResize(): void {
+  this.resizeObserver = new ResizeObserver(entries => {
+    const { width, height } = entries[0].contentRect;
+    this.renderer.setSize(width, height);
+    this.requestRender();
+  });
+  this.resizeObserver.observe(this.container);
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## 4. Implementation Patterns
+
+### 4.1 Global Module Pattern (Mandatory)
+
+All TypeScript modules in `src/modules/` and `src/renderers/` follow the project's Global Module Pattern. The framework module must follow it exactly:
+
+```typescript
+// src/modules/webgl-layer-framework.ts
+
+// 1. Global type declaration
+declare global {
+  var WebGL2LayerFramework: WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass;
+}
+
+// 2. Class implementation
+class WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass {
+  // ...
+}
+
+// 3. Window registration (LAST LINE)
+window.WebGL2LayerFramework = new WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass();
+```
+
+### 4.2 Module Import Pattern
+
+Add to `src/modules/index.ts` as a side-effect import:
+
+```typescript
+import "./webgl-layer-framework";
+```
+
+And `draw-relief-icons.ts` remains in `src/renderers/index.ts` — no change to import structure.
+
+### 4.3 Function Naming Conventions
+
+| Pattern                | Convention                  | Example                                               |
+| ---------------------- | --------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
+| Framework class        | `PascalCase + Class suffix` | `WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass`                           |
+| Window global          | `PascalCase`                | `window.WebGL2LayerFramework`                         |
+| Pure utility functions | `camelCase`                 | `buildCameraBounds`, `detectWebGL2`, `getLayerZIndex` |
+| Internal methods       | `camelCase`                 | `syncTransform`, `observeResize`, `requestRender`     |
+
+### 4.4 TypeScript Type Declarations
+
+New types go in `src/types/global.ts`:
+
+```typescript
+declare global {
+  var WebGL2LayerFramework: import("../modules/webgl-layer-framework").WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass;
+  var drawRelief: (type?: "svg" | "webGL", parentEl?: HTMLElement) => void;
+  var undrawRelief: () => void;
+  var rerenderReliefIcons: () => void;
+}
+```
+
+### 4.5 Error Handling Philosophy
+
+- Framework `init()` failures (WebGL2 unavailable): sets `_fallback = true` via backing field, logs with `WARN` global, returns `false` — no throw
+- Missing DOM elements (e.g., `#map` not found on init): early return + `WARN` log
+- WebGL context loss mid-session: `renderer.forceContextRestore()` then `renderer.dispose()` + re-init on next draw call (preserves existing pattern from `draw-relief-icons.ts`)
+- Unit tests: pure functions throw `Error`s; framework class methods log and return for resilience
+
+### 4.6 Test Patterns
+
+Unit tests co-located with source in `src/modules/`:
+
+```typescript
+// src/modules/webgl-layer-framework.test.ts
+import {describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach} from "vitest";
+import {buildCameraBounds, detectWebGL2, getLayerZIndex, WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass} from "./webgl-layer-framework";
+
+// ─── Pure function tests (no DOM, no WebGL) ───────────────────────────────────
+describe("buildCameraBounds", () => {
+  it("returns correct bounds for identity transform", () => {
+    const b = buildCameraBounds(0, 0, 1, 960, 540);
+    expect(b.left).toBe(0);
+    expect(b.right).toBe(960);
+    expect(b.top).toBe(0);
+    expect(b.bottom).toBe(540);
+  });
+
+  it("returns correct bounds at 2× zoom", () => {
+    const b = buildCameraBounds(0, 0, 2, 960, 540);
+    expect(b.right).toBe(480);
+    expect(b.bottom).toBe(270);
+  });
+
+  it("returns correct bounds with pan offset (viewX negative = panned right)", () => {
+    // viewX=-100 means D3 translated +100px right; map origin is at x=100 on screen
+    const b = buildCameraBounds(-100, -50, 1, 960, 540);
+    expect(b.left).toBe(100); // -(-100)/1
+    expect(b.right).toBe(1060); // (960-(-100))/1
+    expect(b.top).toBe(50);
+  });
+
+  it("top < bottom (Y-down camera convention)", () => {
+    const b = buildCameraBounds(0, 0, 1, 960, 540);
+    expect(b.top).toBeLessThan(b.bottom);
+  });
+
+  it("handles extreme zoom values without NaN", () => {
+    const lo = buildCameraBounds(0, 0, 0.1, 960, 540);
+    const hi = buildCameraBounds(0, 0, 50, 960, 540);
+    expect(Number.isFinite(lo.right)).toBe(true);
+    expect(Number.isFinite(hi.right)).toBe(true);
+  });
+});
+
+describe("detectWebGL2", () => {
+  it("returns false when getContext returns null", () => {
+    const canvas = {getContext: () => null} as unknown as HTMLCanvasElement;
+    expect(detectWebGL2(canvas)).toBe(false);
+  });
+
+  it("returns true when getContext returns a context object", () => {
+    const mockCtx = {getExtension: () => null};
+    const canvas = {getContext: () => mockCtx} as unknown as HTMLCanvasElement;
+    expect(detectWebGL2(canvas)).toBe(true);
+  });
+});
+
+// ─── Class-level tests (stub WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass) ───────────────────────
+describe("WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass", () => {
+  let framework: WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass;
+
+  // Stubs: framework.init() requires DOM; short-circuit by stubbing _fallback
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    framework = new WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass();
+    // Force fallback=false path without real WebGL:
+    (framework as any)._fallback = false;
+    // Inject a minimal scene + renderer stub so register() doesn't throw
+    (framework as any).scene = {add: vi.fn()};
+    (framework as any).layers = new Map();
+  });
+
+  it("register() queues config when called before init()", () => {
+    const fresh = new WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass();
+    const config = {
+      id: "test",
+      anchorLayerId: "terrain",
+      renderOrder: 1,
+      setup: vi.fn(),
+      render: vi.fn(),
+      dispose: vi.fn()
+    };
+    // Before init(), scene is null — register() must queue, not throw
+    expect(() => fresh.register(config)).not.toThrow();
+  });
+
+  it("setVisible(false) does not call dispose() on GPU objects", () => {
+    const mockGroup = {visible: true};
+    const config = {
+      id: "terrain",
+      anchorLayerId: "terrain",
+      renderOrder: 1,
+      setup: vi.fn(),
+      render: vi.fn(),
+      dispose: vi.fn()
+    };
+    (framework as any).layers.set("terrain", {config, group: mockGroup});
+    (framework as any).canvas = {style: {display: "block"}};
+    framework.setVisible("terrain", false);
+    expect(mockGroup.visible).toBe(false);
+    expect(config.dispose).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it("requestRender() coalesces multiple calls into a single RAF", () => {
+    const rafSpy = vi.spyOn(globalThis, "requestAnimationFrame").mockReturnValue(1 as any);
+    (framework as any).renderer = {render: vi.fn()};
+    (framework as any).camera = {};
+    framework.requestRender();
+    framework.requestRender();
+    framework.requestRender();
+    expect(rafSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    rafSpy.mockRestore();
+  });
+
+  it("clearLayer() removes group children without disposing the renderer", () => {
+    const clearFn = vi.fn();
+    const mockGroup = {visible: true, clear: clearFn};
+    const config = {
+      id: "terrain",
+      anchorLayerId: "terrain",
+      renderOrder: 1,
+      setup: vi.fn(),
+      render: vi.fn(),
+      dispose: vi.fn()
+    };
+    (framework as any).layers.set("terrain", {config, group: mockGroup});
+    framework.clearLayer("terrain");
+    expect(clearFn).toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect((framework as any).layers.has("terrain")).toBe(true); // still registered
+  });
+
+  it("hasFallback is false by default (backing field pattern)", () => {
+    expect(framework.hasFallback).toBe(false);
+  });
+});
+```
+
+**Key testability rule:** Pure functions (`buildCameraBounds`, `detectWebGL2`, `getLayerZIndex`) are exported as named exports and are fully testable without DOM or WebGL. The class is tested via stubs injected onto private fields — no real renderer required.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Project Structure
+
+### 5.1 Files Created
+
+```
+src/
+  modules/
+    webgl-layer-framework.ts          ← NEW: Framework class (core deliverable)
+    webgl-layer-framework.test.ts     ← NEW: Unit tests (≥80% coverage target)
+  renderers/
+    draw-relief-icons.ts              ← MODIFIED: Refactored to use framework
+```
+
+### 5.2 Files Modified
+
+```
+src/
+  modules/
+    index.ts                          ← ADD: import "./webgl-layer-framework"
+  types/
+    global.ts                         ← ADD: WebGL2LayerFramework global declaration
+```
+
+### 5.3 `webgl-layer-framework.ts` Internal Structure
+
+```typescript
+// ─── Exports (for testability) ───────────────────────────────────────────────
+export function detectWebGL2(probe?: HTMLCanvasElement): boolean;
+export function buildCameraBounds(
+  viewX: number,
+  viewY: number,
+  scale: number,
+  graphWidth: number,
+  graphHeight: number
+): {left: number; right: number; top: number; bottom: number};
+export function getLayerZIndex(anchorLayerId: string): number;
+
+// ─── Types ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+export interface WebGLLayerConfig {
+  id: string;
+  anchorLayerId: string; // SVG <g> id; canvas id derived as `${id}Canvas`
+  renderOrder: number; // Three.js renderOrder for this layer's Group
+  setup: (group: THREE.Group) => void; // called once on init(); add meshes to group
+  render: (group: THREE.Group) => void; // called each frame before renderer.render()
+  dispose: (group: THREE.Group) => void; // called on unregister(); dispose GPU objects
+}
+
+interface RegisteredLayer {
+  config: WebGLLayerConfig;
+  group: THREE.Group; // framework-owned; passed to all callbacks — abstraction boundary
+}
+
+// ─── Class ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+export class WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass {
+  private canvas: HTMLCanvasElement | null = null;
+  private renderer: THREE.WebGLRenderer | null = null;
+  private camera: THREE.OrthographicCamera | null = null;
+  private scene: THREE.Scene | null = null;
+  private layers: Map<string, RegisteredLayer> = new Map();
+  private pendingConfigs: WebGLLayerConfig[] = []; // queue for register() before init()
+  private resizeObserver: ResizeObserver | null = null;
+  private rafId: number | null = null;
+  private container: HTMLElement | null = null;
+  private _fallback = false; // backing field — NOT readonly, set in init()
+  get hasFallback(): boolean {
+    return this._fallback;
+  }
+
+  // Public API
+  init(): boolean; // call from app bootstrap; processes pendingConfigs queue
+  register(config: WebGLLayerConfig): boolean; // safe to call before init() — queues if needed
+  unregister(id: string): void;
+  setVisible(id: string, visible: boolean): void;
+  clearLayer(id: string): void; // wipe group geometry without removing registration
+  requestRender(): void;
+  syncTransform(): void;
+
+  // Private
+  private render(): void;
+  private observeResize(): void;
+  private subscribeD3Zoom(): void; // called in init(); attaches viewbox.on("zoom.webgl", ...)
+}
+
+// ─── Global Registration (MUST be last line) ─────────────────────────────────
+declare global {
+  var WebGL2LayerFramework: WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass;
+}
+window.WebGL2LayerFramework = new WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass();
+```
+
+### 5.4 `draw-relief-icons.ts` Refactored Structure
+
+The module registers itself with the framework on load. Existing window globals (`drawRelief`, `undrawRelief`, `rerenderReliefIcons`) are preserved for backward compatibility with legacy `public/modules/` code that calls them.
+
+```typescript
+// Registration call (runs at module load time, before init()) ─────────────────
+WebGL2LayerFramework.register({
+  id: "terrain",
+  anchorLayerId: "terrain",
+  renderOrder: getLayerZIndex("terrain"),
+  setup(group) {
+    // Called once by framework after init(); nothing to do here —
+    // geometry is built lazily when drawRelief() is called.
+  },
+  render(group) {
+    // Called each frame. Relief geometry is static between drawRelief() calls;
+    // no per-frame CPU updates required — this is intentionally a no-op.
+  },
+  dispose(group) {
+    group.traverse(obj => {
+      if (obj instanceof Mesh) {
+        obj.geometry.dispose();
+        (obj.material as MeshBasicMaterial).map?.dispose();
+        (obj.material as MeshBasicMaterial).dispose();
+      }
+    });
+  }
+});
+
+// Internal: rebuild geometry from pack.relief data ────────────────────────────
+function buildReliefScene(icons: ReliefIcon[]): void; // adds Meshes to the layer's group
+function drawSvgRelief(icons: ReliefIcon[], parentEl: HTMLElement): void;
+
+// Public window globals (backward-compatible) ─────────────────────────────────
+window.drawRelief = (type = "webGL", parentEl = byId("terrain")) => {
+  if (WebGL2LayerFramework.hasFallback || type === "svg") {
+    drawSvgRelief(icons, parentEl);
+  } else {
+    buildReliefScene(icons);
+    WebGL2LayerFramework.requestRender();
+  }
+};
+window.undrawRelief = () => {
+  // Clear geometry from the framework-owned group — do NOT touch renderer or scene.
+  // clearLayer() removes all Meshes from the group without disposing the renderer.
+  WebGL2LayerFramework.clearLayer("terrain");
+  if (terrainEl) terrainEl.innerHTML = ""; // also clear SVG fallback content
+};
+window.rerenderReliefIcons = () => {
+  WebGL2LayerFramework.requestRender();
+};
+```
+
+### 5.5 DOM Structure After Framework Init
+
+```
+body
+  div#map-container  (NEW; position: relative; width: svgWidth; height: svgHeight)
+    svg#map  (MOVED inside container; position: absolute; inset: 0; z-index: 1)
+    canvas#terrainCanvas  (NEW; id = "${config.id}Canvas" = "terrainCanvas";
+                           position: absolute; inset: 0;
+                           z-index: getLayerZIndex("terrain") → 2 in MVP (above #map);
+                           pointer-events: none; aria-hidden: true)
+```
+
+**Canvas `id` convention:** The framework derives the canvas element id as `${config.id}Canvas`. For `id: "terrain"` → `canvas#terrainCanvas`. For `id: "biomes"` → `canvas#biomesCanvas`. This must be consistent; implementing agents must not hardcode canvas ids.
+
+**MVP z-index note:** In MVP both `#map` (z-index: 1) and `canvas#terrainCanvas` (z-index: 2) are stacked as siblings within `#map-container`. The canvas is visually above the entire `#map` SVG. This is a known, accepted limitation. See Decision 3.
+
+### 5.6 Framework Initialization Sequence
+
+```
+1. Framework module loaded (via src/modules/index.ts import)
+   → window.WebGL2LayerFramework = new WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass()
+   → constructor does NOTHING: renderer=null, _fallback unset, pendingConfigs=[]
+
+2. draw-relief-icons.ts loaded (via src/renderers/index.ts import)
+   → WebGL2LayerFramework.register({ id: "terrain", ... })
+   → init() has NOT been called yet — register() pushes to pendingConfigs[]
+   → This is safe by design: register() before init() is explicitly supported
+
+3. App bootstrap calls WebGL2LayerFramework.init()  ← EXPLICIT CALL REQUIRED
+   → _fallback = !detectWebGL2()  (uses backing field, not readonly)
+   → if _fallback: init() returns false; all subsequent API calls are no-ops
+   → creates div#map-container wrapper, moves svg#map inside (z-index:1)
+   → creates THREE.WebGLRenderer(canvas), THREE.Scene, THREE.OrthographicCamera
+   → sets canvas id, position:absolute, inset:0, pointer-events:none, z-index:2
+   → calls subscribeD3Zoom(): viewbox.on("zoom.webgl", () => this.requestRender())
+   → processes pendingConfigs[]: for each config:
+       creates THREE.Group with config.renderOrder
+       calls config.setup(group)
+       adds group to scene
+       stores RegisteredLayer in layers Map
+   → attaches ResizeObserver to #map-container
+
+4. Main map generation completes → window.drawRelief() called by legacy JS
+   → if WebGL: buildReliefScene(icons) builds Meshes in layer's group
+   → calls requestRender() → next RAF:
+       render(): syncTransform() → each visible layer's render(group) → renderer.render(scene,camera)
+   → if fallback: drawSvgRelief(icons, parentEl)
+
+5. D3 zoom/pan → framework's own "zoom.webgl" listener fires → requestRender()
+   rerenderReliefIcons() also calls requestRender() as belt-and-suspenders
+
+6. Layer hide: window.undrawRelief()
+   → WebGL2LayerFramework.clearLayer("terrain"): group.clear() wipes Meshes; renderer untouched
+   → framework.setVisible("terrain", false): group.visible = false
+
+7. Layer show: window.drawRelief()
+   → buildReliefScene(icons) rebuilds Meshes in group
+   → framework.setVisible("terrain", true): group.visible = true
+   → requestRender()
+```
+
+---
+
+## 6. Architecture Validation
+
+### 6.1 FR Coverage Matrix
+
+| Requirement                                    | Addressed By                                                                                          | Status                                              |
+| ---------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- |
+| FR1: Single WebGL2 context                     | `WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass` owns one `THREE.WebGLRenderer`                                            | ✅                                                  |
+| FR2: Canvas at correct z-index                 | `getLayerZIndex(anchorLayerId)` → canvas z-index                                                      | ✅ (MVP: above SVG)                                 |
+| FR3: Register layer by anchor + callback       | `framework.register(config)`                                                                          | ✅                                                  |
+| FR4: Layer registry                            | `layers: Map<string, RegisteredLayer>`                                                                | ✅                                                  |
+| FR5: Sync to D3 zoom transform                 | `syncTransform()` reads `viewX, viewY, scale` globals                                                 | ✅                                                  |
+| FR6: Update on D3 change                       | `requestRender()` called from `rerenderReliefIcons`                                                   | ✅                                                  |
+| FR7: Map-space → WebGL clip coordinates        | `buildCameraBounds()` formula                                                                         | ✅                                                  |
+| FR8: Toggle without GPU teardown               | `setVisible()` → `group.visible` only                                                                 | ✅                                                  |
+| FR9: Resize canvas on viewport change          | `ResizeObserver` on container                                                                         | ✅                                                  |
+| FR10: Recalculate z-index on layer reorder     | `getLayerZIndex()` reads live DOM position                                                            | ✅                                                  |
+| FR11: Dispose layer + GPU resources            | `unregister(id)` → disposes GeometryBuffers, removes from scene                                       | ✅                                                  |
+| FR12: All relief icons in one draw call        | Per-set `Mesh` with merged `BufferGeometry` (existing batched approach)                               | ✅                                                  |
+| FR13: Icons at SVG-space coordinates           | Camera in SVG pixel-space; icon positions in `pack.relief` unchanged                                  | ✅                                                  |
+| FR14: Scale with zoom and user setting         | Camera bounds change with zoom; icon size uses `r.s` from relief data                                 | ✅                                                  |
+| FR15: Per-icon rotation                        | Rotation encoded in quad vertex positions during `buildSetMesh`                                       | ⚠️ Verify rotation support in existing buildSetMesh |
+| FR16: Configurable opacity                     | `MeshBasicMaterial.opacity` + `transparent: true`                                                     | ✅                                                  |
+| FR17: Re-render on terrain data change         | `drawRelief()` calls `buildReliefScene()` + `requestRender()`                                         | ✅                                                  |
+| FR18: WebGL2 detection + fallback              | `detectWebGL2()` → `hasFallback` flag                                                                 | ✅                                                  |
+| FR19: SVG fallback visually identical          | Existing `drawSvg()` preserved unchanged                                                              | ✅                                                  |
+| FR20: No pointer-event capture                 | `canvas.style.pointerEvents = "none"`                                                                 | ✅                                                  |
+| FR21: Existing Layers panel unchanged          | `drawRelief`/`undrawRelief` window globals preserved                                                  | ✅                                                  |
+| FR22: Register without z-index knowledge       | `framework.register` derives z-index internally                                                       | ✅                                                  |
+| FR23: Render callback receives D3 transform    | `render(group)` invoked each frame after `syncTransform()`; camera already synced when callback fires | ✅                                                  |
+| FR24: Same visibility API for all layers       | `framework.setVisible(id, bool)` uniform for all registered layers                                    | ✅                                                  |
+| FR25: Coordinate sync testable in isolation    | `buildCameraBounds` is a pure exported function                                                       | ✅                                                  |
+| FR26: Fallback detection testable              | `detectWebGL2(probeCanvas)` accepts injectable canvas                                                 | ✅                                                  |
+| FR27: Registration testable without real WebGL | `hasFallback = true` path is a no-op; stub renderers in tests                                         | ✅                                                  |
+
+**FR15 Note:** The existing `buildSetMesh` in `draw-relief-icons.ts` constructs static quads; rotation may not be applied. This must be verified and implemented (per-icon rotation via vertex transformation in `buildSetMesh`) before MVP ships.
+
+### 6.2 NFR Compliance
+
+| NFR                                        | Status     | Implementation                                                                            |
+| ------------------------------------------ | ---------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| NFR-P1: <16ms @ 1k icons                   | Enabled by | Single-batch `BufferGeometry` per atlas set                                               |
+| NFR-P2: <100ms @ 10k icons                 | Enabled by | Same batch approach; measure at implementation                                            |
+| NFR-P3: Toggle <4ms                        | ✅         | `group.visible = false` is O(1)                                                           |
+| NFR-P4: Pan/zoom latency <8ms              | ✅         | RAF-coalesced; `syncTransform()` is one matrix update                                     |
+| NFR-P5: Init <200ms                        | Enabled by | Three.js renderer init is ~50–100ms                                                       |
+| NFR-P6: No GPU teardown on hide            | ✅         | `setVisible` never calls `dispose()`                                                      |
+| NFR-C1: WebGL2 as sole gate                | ✅         | `detectWebGL2()` uses `canvas.getContext('webgl2')`                                       |
+| NFR-C2: Cross-browser visual parity        | Enabled by | Three.js normalizes WebGL2 across browsers                                                |
+| NFR-C3: Max 2 contexts                     | ✅         | Framework creates 1 context; globe creates 1                                              |
+| NFR-C4: Fallback when HW accel disabled    | ✅         | `detectWebGL2()` returns false → SVG path                                                 |
+| NFR-M1: Framework unknown of layer content | ✅         | `setup/dispose` callbacks encapsulate all content                                         |
+| NFR-M2: New layer = 1 `register()` call    | ✅         | Confirmed by API design                                                                   |
+| NFR-M3: Global Module Pattern              | ✅         | `window.WebGL2LayerFramework = new ...` at bottom                                         |
+| NFR-M4: Sync formula documented            | ✅         | `buildCameraBounds` has full derivation in JSDoc                                          |
+| NFR-M5: ≥80% test coverage                 | Target     | Tests for `buildCameraBounds`, `detectWebGL2`, `getLayerZIndex`, `register`, `setVisible` |
+| NFR-B1: Tree-shaking Three.js              | ✅         | Named imports only                                                                        |
+| NFR-B2: ≤50KB bundle increase              | ✅         | No new dependencies; framework code ~5KB                                                  |
+
+### 6.3 Architecture Risks and Mitigations
+
+| Risk                                          | Likelihood | Impact | Architecture Mitigation                                                                    |
+| --------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| D3 + WebGL coordinate offset at extreme zoom  | Medium     | High   | `buildCameraBounds` is unit-tested at zoom 0.1–50; exact formula documented                |
+| FR15: Rotation not in existing `buildSetMesh` | High       | Medium | Flag as pre-MVP verification item; add rotation attribute if missing                       |
+| MVP z-ordering: canvas above SVG              | High       | Medium | Accepted tradeoff; documented; Phase 2 DOM-split design provided                           |
+| `register()` called before `init()`           | High       | High   | `register()` pushes to `pendingConfigs[]`; `init()` processes queue — order-safe by design |
+| `undrawRelief` bypasses framework clearLayer  | Medium     | Medium | `undrawRelief` explicitly calls `framework.clearLayer()` per section 5.4                   |
+| Context loss mid-session                      | Low        | High   | Framework inherits existing `forceContextRestore` pattern from `draw-relief-icons.ts`      |
+| Three.js API bleeds into layer code           | Low        | High   | All callbacks receive `THREE.Group` only — `scene`, `renderer`, `camera` are private       |
+
+### 6.4 Decision Coherence Check
+
+| Decision Pair                                                        | Compatible? | Note                                                                                      |
+| -------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| Single context (D1) + Layer registry (D2)                            | ✅          | `renderOrder` on `THREE.Group` within shared scene; one renderer, multiple groups         |
+| Group abstraction (D2) + framework owns scene (D1)                   | ✅          | Callbacks receive `Three.Group` only; `scene`/`renderer`/`camera` stay private            |
+| render(group) callback (D2) + RAF coalescing (D7)                    | ✅          | `render(group)` dispatched inside RAF callback before `renderer.render()` — correct order |
+| MVP z-index above SVG (D3) + pointer-events:none (D3)                | ✅          | Interaction preserved regardless of z-stack position                                      |
+| Camera sync using globals (D4) + testability (FR25)                  | ✅          | `buildCameraBounds` is pure; globals are injected in tests                                |
+| No GPU teardown (D5) + `undrawRelief` backward compat (section 5.4)  | ✅          | `undrawRelief` calls `framework.clearLayer()` (geometry only); renderer untouched         |
+| register() before init() (section 5.6) + pendingConfigs queue (D2)   | ✅          | Queue pattern decouples module load order from DOM/WebGL readiness                        |
+| D3 zoom subscription in init() (D6) + per-layer render callback (D2) | ✅          | Framework owns the zoom listener; layer's `render(group)` called inside the resulting RAF |
+| On-demand RAF render (D7) + ResizeObserver (D8)                      | ✅          | Both call `requestRender()` which coalesces to one RAF                                    |
+
+---
+
+## 7. Implementation Guidance for AI Agents
+
+When implementing this architecture, follow these rules precisely:
+
+### MUST DO
+
+1. **Framework module registers first** — `src/modules/index.ts` import must appear before renderer imports
+2. **`window.WebGL2LayerFramework = new WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass()` is the last line** of the framework module
+3. **Export `buildCameraBounds`, `detectWebGL2`, `getLayerZIndex`** as named exports — tests depend on them
+4. **`setVisible(id, false)` NEVER calls `renderer.dispose()`** — sets `group.visible = false` only
+5. **Implement `clearLayer(id)`** — `undrawRelief` calls this to wipe group geometry; layer stays registered
+6. **Use `private _fallback = false` + `get hasFallback()`** — NOT `readonly hasFallback = false` (TypeScript compile error)
+7. **Call `init()` before any `drawRelief()` invocation** — app bootstrap must call `WebGL2LayerFramework.init()`
+8. **All layer callbacks receive `THREE.Group`** — `setup(group)`, `render(group)`, `dispose(group)`; never pass `scene`
+9. **Subscribe D3 zoom in `init()`**: `viewbox.on("zoom.webgl", () => this.requestRender())`
+10. **Canvas `id` = `${config.id}Canvas`** — derived by framework; never hardcoded in layer code
+11. **Canvas element gets**: `pointer-events: none; aria-hidden: true; position: absolute; inset: 0; z-index: 2`
+12. **Fallback path**: when `hasFallback === true`, all framework methods return silently; `drawRelief` calls `drawSvgRelief`
+13. **`window.drawRelief`, `window.undrawRelief`, `window.rerenderReliefIcons`** must remain as window globals (legacy JS calls them)
+14. **Verify FR15** (per-icon rotation) in `buildSetMesh` before MVP — add rotation support if missing
+
+### MUST NOT DO
+
+1. **Do NOT** declare `readonly hasFallback: boolean = false` — this causes a TypeScript error when `init()` sets it
+2. **Do NOT** pass `scene`, `renderer`, or `camera` to any layer callback — `THREE.Group` is the sole abstraction boundary
+3. **Do NOT** call `renderer.dispose()` from `undrawRelief` or any visibility toggle — only from full framework teardown
+4. **Do NOT** create a second `THREE.WebGLRenderer` — framework owns the only map renderer
+5. **Do NOT** move layer `<g>` elements between SVG elements — DOM-split is Phase 2
+6. **Do NOT** add any new entries to `public/modules/` — all new code is in `src/`
+7. **Do NOT** break the `window.drawRelief(type, parentEl)` signature — legacy callers
+8. **Do NOT** use `isNaN()` — use `Number.isNaN()`; or `parseInt()` without radix
+9. **Do NOT** import Three.js as `import * as THREE from "three"` — use named imports only
+
+### Verification Checklist
+
+- [ ] `npm run lint` passes with zero errors
+- [ ] `npx vitest run` passes all tests
+- [ ] `buildCameraBounds` tests pass at zoom 0.1, 1, 2, 10, 50
+- [ ] `detectWebGL2` test passes with null-returning mock canvas
+- [ ] Layer registration test passes with stub scene
+- [ ] `setVisible(false)` test confirms GPU buffers remain allocated
+- [ ] Visual: relief icons render at correct coordinate positions
+- [ ] Visual: toggling terrain layer on/off preserves icon positions
+- [ ] Visual: pan/zoom redraws canvas correctly in sync with SVG
+
+---
+
+## 8. Next Steps
+
+With this architecture complete, the recommended implementation sequence is:
+
+**Story 1:** Create `webgl-layer-framework.ts` with exported pure functions and stub class methods; write all unit tests first (TDD).
+
+**Story 2:** Implement `WebGL2LayerFrameworkClass` core: `init()` with `_fallback` backing field, `detectWebGL2()`, canvas creation (`id = ${config.id}Canvas`), `#map-container` wrapper, `ResizeObserver`, D3 zoom subscription (`viewbox.on("zoom.webgl", ...)`), `pendingConfigs[]` queue processing.
+
+**Story 3:** Implement `register()` (with pre-init queue support), `unregister()`, `setVisible()`, `clearLayer()`, `requestRender()` (RAF coalescing), `syncTransform()`, per-frame `render(group)` dispatch in `render()`.
+
+**Story 4:** Refactor `draw-relief-icons.ts` to use `WebGL2LayerFramework.register()` and remove the module-level renderer state. Verify FR15 rotation support.
+
+**Story 5:** Integration testing — generate map, toggle terrain layer, pan/zoom, verify visual output matches SVG baseline.
+
+**Story 6:** Bundle size audit — verify Three.js tree-shaking, confirm ≤50KB gzipped delta.
diff --git a/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md b/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e859db45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/prd.md
@@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
+---
+stepsCompleted:
+  [
+    "step-01-init",
+    "step-02-discovery",
+    "step-02b-vision",
+    "step-02c-executive-summary",
+    "step-03-success",
+    "step-04-journeys",
+    "step-05-domain",
+    "step-06-innovation",
+    "step-07-project-type",
+    "step-08-scoping",
+    "step-09-functional",
+    "step-10-nonfunctional",
+    "step-11-polish",
+    "step-12-complete"
+  ]
+inputDocuments:
+  - "_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/research/technical-WebGL-SVG-layered-rendering-research-2026-03-12.md"
+  - "_bmad-output/brainstorming/brainstorming-session-2026-03-12-001.md"
+  - "_bmad-output/project-context.md"
+workflowType: "prd"
+classification:
+  projectType: "web_app"
+  domain: "general"
+  complexity: "high"
+  projectContext: "brownfield"
+outOfScope:
+  - "SVG export compatibility (will be addressed in a separate branch)"
+  - "3D globe view / Three.js globe renderer (leave as-is)"
+  - "Playwright / E2E testing (deferred to later)"
+---
+
+# Product Requirements Document - Fantasy-Map-Generator
+
+**Author:** Azgaar
+**Date:** 2026-03-12
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+Fantasy-Map-Generator (FMG) is a browser-based procedural world map generator used by worldbuilders, game designers, and writers to create and edit detailed fantasy maps. The entire map is rendered as a single SVG document with 32 named layer groups managed by D3. As map complexity grows — larger worlds, higher cell counts, denser terrain coverage — the SVG relief icons layer (`#terrain`) becomes the primary rendering bottleneck: each icon is an individual `<use>` DOM node, producing linear DOM growth and main-thread layout cost that degrades perceived map responsiveness.
+
+This project introduces a **WebGL 2D layer framework** to replace SVG-based rendering for GPU-suitable layers, with the **relief icons layer as the MVP**. The framework inserts a `<canvas>` element into the existing SVG layer stack at the correct z-position using CSS `position: absolute` and `z-index`, rendering WebGL content that is visually indistinguishable from the current SVG output. All existing layer toggle, reorder, and visibility semantics are preserved. The framework is designed as a generic, extensible foundation for future layer migrations.
+
+### What Makes This Special
+
+The key architectural insight is that the user-visible contract is the _layer stack_ — correct ordering, correct visibility, correct visual output — not the rendering technology underneath. By decoupling render technology from layer position (via DOM z-index rather than SVG document order), any layer can be migrated from SVG to WebGL independently, without disrupting adjacent layers or requiring a full rewrite.
+
+The relief icons layer is the ideal MVP: it is icon-heavy (thousands of `<use>` instances on large maps), visually self-contained (no `<text>`, no `<textPath>`, no filter dependencies on neighbouring layers), and currently the most user-visible performance bottleneck. A single WebGL draw call with instanced rendering replaces O(N) DOM nodes. The framework established here can subsequently accelerate biomes, regions, borders, and other path-heavy layers.
+
+### Project Classification
+
+| Field               | Value                                                                                                     |
+| ------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Project Type**    | Web App (Browser SPA, no server)                                                                          |
+| **Domain**          | General creative tooling                                                                                  |
+| **Complexity**      | High — novel WebGL/SVG interleaving, multiple architectural trade-offs, regression risk on layer ordering |
+| **Project Context** | Brownfield — isolated subsystem replacement in a large existing codebase                                  |
+| **Out of Scope**    | SVG export compatibility; 3D globe view; Playwright/E2E testing                                           |
+
+---
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+### User Success
+
+- Relief icons render on a 1,000-cell map in under 100ms perceived time on a mid-range GPU — users experience no lag when the terrain layer is active
+- Map visual output is pixel-indistinguishable from the current SVG version: same icon positions, sizes, orientations, and colors
+- Toggling the terrain layer on/off is instantaneous — no pop-in, no stutter, no GPU state teardown
+- All existing layer visibility controls, show/hide toggles, and layer reorder operations work identically to the SVG version
+- Large maps (10,000+ cells with dense terrain) are usable without browser tab lag or unresponsive UI
+
+### Business Success
+
+- Relief rendering time reduced by >80% on maps with 5,000+ terrain icons versus the current SVG implementation
+- The WebGL layer framework is extensible: at least 3 additional layers can be migrated using the same framework without refactoring the core
+- Zero regressions to non-terrain layers — all 31 other SVG layers continue to function correctly after the migration
+- The implementation ships as a TypeScript module in `src/` following the existing Global Module Pattern
+
+### Technical Success
+
+- A single `<canvas>` element is inserted into the map DOM at the correct z-index position (between `#rivers` and `#relig` layers), absolutely positioned and coextensive with the SVG viewport
+- WebGL renders relief icons via instanced rendering (InstancedMesh or `gl.POINTS`) in a single draw call regardless of icon count
+- The WebGL canvas maintains coordinate alignment with the SVG viewport through D3 zoom/pan transforms — no manual coordinate offset calculations needed at render time
+- Layer toggle preserves GPU state (`visible = false` / `canvas.style.display = 'none'`) — no buffer teardown on hide
+- No WebGL context limit violations — a single WebGL context handles all WebGL layers via `renderOrder` / draw order management
+- Vitest unit tests cover framework core: canvas insertion, z-index calculation, coordinate sync, and visibility toggle logic
+
+### Measurable Outcomes
+
+| Metric                         | Baseline                         | Target                    |
+| ------------------------------ | -------------------------------- | ------------------------- |
+| Relief render time @ 1k icons  | Measured at implementation start | < 16ms (1 frame at 60fps) |
+| Relief render time @ 10k icons | Measured at implementation start | < 100ms                   |
+| DOM node delta (terrain layer) | O(N) `<use>` elements            | 1 `<canvas>` element      |
+| WebGL contexts open            | 1 (globe)                        | 2 (globe + map)           |
+| Layer regression count         | 0                                | 0                         |
+
+---
+
+## User Journeys
+
+### Journey 1: The Worldbuilder — Dense Continent (Happy Path)
+
+**Persona:** Katrin, a fantasy novelist who has been using FMG for 2 years to create the world for her book series. Her current project is a continent-spanning empire with multiple mountain ranges.
+
+**Opening Scene:** Katrin generates a new map with 8,000 cells and turns on the terrain layer. With the old SVG renderer, the browser UI freezes for 3 seconds every time she enables terrain icons. She's gotten used to working around it — toggling terrain off while editing, then turning it back on for screenshots.
+
+**Rising Action:** With the WebGL relief layer active, Katrin enables terrain for the first time on her new map. The icons appear on screen without any perceptible delay. She zooms into the northern mountain range — the icons scale correctly, stay perfectly positioned over the terrain cells, and the canvas tracks the D3 pan/zoom exactly.
+
+**Climax:** Katrin opens the Style panel and adjusts the icon opacity and scale. The WebGL layer responds to the same style parameters as before. She switches between terrain view and no-terrain view a dozen times while fine-tuning — each toggle is instant. She never once thinks about the rendering technology.
+
+**Resolution:** Katrin now leaves terrain icons on during her entire editing session. She can evaluate composition decisions with terrain visible — something she avoided before because the performance made it impractical.
+
+**Revealed Requirements:** Canvas inserted at correct z-index; D3 zoom/pan synced to WebGL camera; layer toggle is instant (GPU state preserved); visual parity with SVG icons; style parameters (opacity, scale) respected.
+
+---
+
+### Journey 2: The Worldbuilder — Layer Toggle During Edit (Edge Case)
+
+**Persona:** Same as Katrin, mid-session editing.
+
+**Opening Scene:** Katrin has terrain icons visible. She selects a burg to edit its name. The editor panel opens over the map. She wants to hide terrain icons to see the underlying cell grid more clearly.
+
+**Rising Action:** She clicks the terrain visibility toggle. The canvas disappears. She edits the burg. She clicks toggle again — canvas reappears, all icons in exactly the same positions as before. No flicker, no reload, no icon repositioning.
+
+**Climax:** Katrin zooms out, pans to a different region, then zooms back in. Relief icons render at the new zoom level instantly. She modifies a river by dragging it — the terrain layer doesn't interfere with the SVG interaction layer above it.
+
+**Resolution:** The canvas and SVG layers are completely independent in their interaction model. The canvas is visually present but never intercepts mouse/pointer events on SVG layers above it.
+
+**Revealed Requirements:** Canvas must have `pointer-events: none` — all interaction remains on the SVG layer; canvas visibility toggle must not reset GPU buffers; re-show must resume from exact previous state.
+
+---
+
+### Journey 3: The Developer — Migrating a Second Layer (Framework Extension)
+
+**Persona:** Alex, a contributor to FMG who wants to migrate the `#biomes` layer to WebGL after the relief MVP ships.
+
+**Opening Scene:** Alex reads the relief layer implementation in `src/`. The framework has a clear API: register a layer with a z-index anchor, provide a render function that receives the current D3 transform, and the framework handles canvas lifecycle. Alex creates a new file `biomes-webgl.ts`.
+
+**Rising Action:** Alex calls `WebGLLayerFramework.register({ id: 'biomes', anchorLayerId: 'biomes', render: renderBiomesLayer })`. The framework inserts a canvas at the correct DOM position automatically. Alex implements the `renderBiomesLayer` function using the same instanced patterns from the relief renderer.
+
+**Climax:** Alex toggles biomes visibility — the framework's visibility API maps to the same toggle mechanism as relief. Layer ordering between biomes and relief is correct because the framework uses z-index derived from the SVG layer stack positions.
+
+**Resolution:** The biomes layer migrates in ~200 lines of new code. No changes to the framework core. The pattern is consistent, documented, and testable.
+
+**Revealed Requirements:** Framework exposes a public `register(config)` API; z-index is derived automatically from the anchor SVG layer's DOM position; render callback receives D3 transform; framework has no knowledge of specific layer content.
+
+---
+
+### Journey 4: The Developer — Debugging a Visual Regression
+
+**Persona:** Alex, investigating a bug report: "relief icons appear offset at high zoom levels."
+
+**Opening Scene:** Alex opens the browser dev tools. The offset only appears when D3 zoom scale > 10. The SVG viewbox and the canvas size are both correct. The transform is being applied — but to the wrong origin point.
+
+**Rising Action:** Alex checks the coordinate sync code. The D3 zoom transform (`translate(x, y) scale(k)`) is applied to the SVG `#viewbox` group. The WebGL camera must replicate this exactly: translate by `(x, y)`, then scale by `k`, with the same origin. Alex identifies that the WebGL projection matrix was using canvas center as origin instead of `(0, 0)`.
+
+**Climax:** The fix is a one-line change to the projection matrix construction. Alex adds a Vitest unit test asserting that for a given D3 transform, the projected icon position matches the expected SVG coordinate.
+
+**Resolution:** The regression is caught by the new test. The framework's coordinate sync logic is now explicitly tested and documented.
+
+**Revealed Requirements:** Coordinate sync logic must be unit-testable in isolation; the transform pipeline must have a clear, documented contract between D3 zoom state and WebGL projection; Vitest tests for coordinate sync are part of MVP.
+
+---
+
+### Journey Requirements Summary
+
+| Capability                                                       | Revealed By     |
+| ---------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------- |
+| Canvas inserted at correct z-index, coextensive with SVG         | Journey 1, 2, 3 |
+| D3 zoom/pan transform synchronized to WebGL camera               | Journey 1, 4    |
+| `pointer-events: none` on canvas — SVG layers remain interactive | Journey 2       |
+| Layer visibility toggle preserves GPU state                      | Journey 2       |
+| Public framework registration API for new layers                 | Journey 3       |
+| Z-index auto-derived from SVG layer DOM position                 | Journey 3       |
+| Coordinate sync unit-testable in isolation                       | Journey 4       |
+| Vitest tests for framework core                                  | Journey 4       |
+
+---
+
+## Innovation & Novel Patterns
+
+### Detected Innovation Areas
+
+**1. WebGL Canvas Injected into SVG Layer Stack via CSS Z-Index**
+
+The core architectural innovation: a `<canvas>` element can be placed at any arbitrary position _within_ the visual stacking of an existing SVG document by using `position: absolute; inset: 0; z-index: N` on the canvas and wrapping the SVG in a positioned container. This allows WebGL-rendered content to appear correctly between SVG layer groups without any DOM restructuring, foreignObject usage, or FBO compositing overhead.
+
+This pattern is non-obvious. Standard approaches either place the canvas below/above the SVG (losing interleaving) or nest it inside the SVG via `<foreignObject>` (triggering full FBO compositing on every frame). The CSS z-index approach escapes both penalties: the browser compositor stacks the canvas at the correct visual depth while the SVG renders independently.
+
+**2. Generic GPU Layer Registration Framework for D3 SVG Maps**
+
+No existing library solves the exact problem of: "I have a D3-managed SVG with named layer groups, and I want to incrementally replace individual layers with WebGL renderers while preserving the layer stack contract." Mapbox GL and deck.gl both assume full WebGL ownership of the viewport. This framework inverts that assumption — SVG is the primary renderer, and WebGL is inserts itself as a peer.
+
+The framework derives z-index values automatically from the DOM position of anchor SVG layer elements, making the WebGL layer self-positioning: if SVG layer order changes, the WebGL canvas z-index updates automatically.
+
+**3. D3 Zoom/Pan → WebGL Orthographic Camera Synchronization**
+
+The D3 zoom transform (`translate(x, y) scale(k)`) is a 2D affine transform applied to an SVG group. Replicating it in WebGL as an orthographic projection matrix — where the viewport dimensions are the SVG dimensions, the camera origin is `(0, 0)` in SVG space, and scale maps directly to camera zoom — is a precise mathematical correspondence that enables pixel-perfect alignment between SVG and WebGL rendered content at all zoom levels.
+
+### Validation Approach
+
+| Innovation                 | Validation Method                                                                                                                              |
+| -------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| CSS z-index interleaving   | Visual regression: screenshot comparison at 5 zoom levels with terrain layer at positions 5, 12, 20 in the 32-layer stack                      |
+| GPU layer framework        | Integration: register 2 layers (relief + biomes stub), verify z-index ordering, toggle each independently, confirm no cross-layer interference |
+| D3 → WebGL coordinate sync | Unit test: for 20 (transform, icon-position) pairs, assert WebGL projected screen position matches expected SVG coordinate within 0.5px        |
+
+### Risk Mitigation
+
+| Risk                                                        | Mitigation                                                                                            |
+| ----------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| WebGL context limit (browser allows 8–16 contexts)          | Single WebGL context for all WebGL layers; `renderOrder` manages draw order within the context        |
+| Canvas z-index drifts when SVG layers are reordered by user | Z-index recalculated from live DOM position of anchor layer on every re-render                        |
+| D3 transform sync breaks at extreme zoom levels             | Unit tests cover zoom scale 0.1 to 50; coordinate sync verified against SVG transform matrix directly |
+| `will-change: transform` GPU memory overhead                | Applied only to the canvas element; removed after initial render stabilizes                           |
+
+---
+
+## Web App Specific Requirements
+
+### Browser Support Matrix
+
+| Browser | Minimum Version | Gating Feature             |
+| ------- | --------------- | -------------------------- |
+| Chrome  | 69              | WebGL2, OffscreenCanvas    |
+| Firefox | 105             | OffscreenCanvas in Workers |
+| Safari  | 16.4            | OffscreenCanvas            |
+| Edge    | 79              | WebGL2                     |
+
+The minimum bar is **WebGL2** context support. If `canvas.getContext('webgl2')` returns null, the framework must gracefully fall back to the existing SVG relief renderer with no user-visible error.
+
+### Responsiveness & Layout
+
+- FMG is a desktop-first application; no mobile/touch optimization required for this feature
+- Canvas dimensions must update on SVG viewport resize (window resize, panel open/close)
+- The `ResizeObserver` pattern is used to react to SVG container size changes
+
+### Interaction Model
+
+- Canvas must have `pointer-events: none` — the entire interaction model (drag, click, hover, editor panels) remains on the SVG layers
+- No new keyboard shortcuts or UI controls are introduced by the framework itself
+- The existing layer visibility toggle (checkbox/button per layer in the Layers panel) is reused — the framework hooks into the existing toggle mechanism
+
+### Accessibility
+
+- The `<canvas>` element has `aria-hidden="true"` — it is purely decorative/visual
+- No ARIA roles, labels, or keyboard navigation are added to the canvas
+- All existing accessibility attributes on SVG elements are unaffected
+
+---
+
+## Project Scoping & Phased Development
+
+### MVP Strategy
+
+**MVP Approach:** Platform MVP — prove the generic framework architecture is sound by shipping one complete, production-quality layer migration. The relief icons layer is the proving ground, not the destination.
+
+**Rationale:** A narrow one-off solution (SVG → WebGL just for relief) would solve the immediate performance problem but leave the codebase with an ad-hoc integration that doesn't generalize. A platform MVP establishes the framework contract (registration API, coordinate sync, z-index management, visibility toggle) so that future layer migrations are straightforward rather than bespoke.
+
+**Resource Requirement:** Single developer. No specialized WebGL expertise required beyond what the research documents already provide — Three.js handles the WebGL abstraction layer.
+
+### Phase 1 — MVP
+
+**Core Journeys Supported:** Journey 1 (worldbuilder, happy path), Journey 2 (layer toggle edge case)
+
+**Must-Have Capabilities:**
+
+| Capability                                                            | Justification                                          |
+| --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ |
+| `WebGL2LayerFramework` TypeScript class in `src/`                     | Core deliverable — all other capabilities depend on it |
+| Canvas insertion at correct z-index                                   | Without this, layer ordering breaks                    |
+| D3 zoom/pan → WebGL camera synchronization                            | Without this, icons appear at wrong positions          |
+| `pointer-events: none` on canvas                                      | Without this, map interaction breaks                   |
+| WebGL2 → SVG fallback when WebGL2 unavailable                         | Without this, users on unsupported browsers are broken |
+| Relief icons layer migrated to WebGL (`InstancedMesh` or `gl.POINTS`) | MVP deliverable — proves the framework                 |
+| Layer visibility toggle (GPU state preserved)                         | Without this, toggling terrain destroys GPU buffers    |
+| Canvas resize on SVG viewport change                                  | Without this, canvas misaligns after window resize     |
+| Vitest unit tests for coordinate sync and framework core              | Required per project quality standards                 |
+
+**Out of MVP:**
+
+- SVG export compatibility (separate branch)
+- 3D globe view (untouched)
+- Playwright/E2E tests (deferred)
+- OffscreenCanvas / Worker thread rendering
+- Any layer migration beyond `#terrain`
+
+### Phase 2 — Growth (Post-MVP)
+
+- Migrate `#biomes` layer to WebGL (largest path-heavy layer after terrain)
+- Migrate `#regions` and `#borders` to WebGL
+- OffscreenCanvas + Worker thread: move WebGL render loop off main thread
+- Dynamic level-of-detail: reduce icon instance count at small zoom scales
+
+### Phase 3 — Vision
+
+- All GPU-suitable 2D layers rendered via WebGL
+- SVG retained only for: text labels, `<textPath>`, interactive elements, `<use>` symbol layers (compass, emblems, burg icons)
+- Sub-16ms full-map re-render at continent scale
+- Framework pattern documented as a contribution guide for future layers
+
+### Risk Assessment
+
+| Risk                                                       | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation                                                                 |
+| ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| D3 + WebGL coordinate sync offset at edge zoom levels      | Medium     | High   | Unit tests at zoom 0.1–50 before MVP ships                                 |
+| WebGL2 fallback path not tested before release             | Medium     | High   | Explicit fallback test in Vitest (mock `getContext('webgl2')` → null)      |
+| Relief icon atlas UV mapping incorrect for some icon types | Low        | Medium | Visual regression: render all atlas tiles in isolation during development  |
+| Canvas z-index incorrect after SVG layer reorder           | Low        | Medium | Z-index recalculation on every render from live DOM position               |
+| Three.js bundle size regression                            | Low        | Low    | Tree-shaking via `three/addons` imports only; check bundle size diff in CI |
+
+---
+
+## Functional Requirements
+
+### WebGL Layer Framework Core
+
+- **FR1:** The system can initialize a single WebGL2 rendering context that is shared across all registered WebGL layers
+- **FR2:** The framework can insert a `<canvas>` element into the map container at a z-index position corresponding to a named anchor SVG layer's position in the visual stack
+- **FR3:** The framework can register a new WebGL layer by accepting an anchor SVG layer ID and a render callback function
+- **FR4:** The framework can maintain a registry of all registered WebGL layers and their current z-index positions
+
+### Coordinate & Transform Synchronization
+
+- **FR5:** The framework can synchronize the WebGL rendering viewport to the current D3 zoom transform (translate x, translate y, scale k) applied to the SVG viewbox group
+- **FR6:** The framework can update the WebGL transform when the D3 zoom or pan state changes
+- **FR7:** The framework can convert any map-space coordinate (SVG viewport space) to the correct WebGL clip-space coordinate at any zoom level
+
+### Layer Lifecycle Management
+
+- **FR8:** Users can toggle individual WebGL layer visibility on and off without destroying GPU buffer state or requiring a re-upload of vertex/instance data
+- **FR9:** The framework can resize the canvas element and update the WebGL viewport to match the SVG viewport dimensions when the browser window or map container is resized
+- **FR10:** The framework can recalculate a WebGL layer's z-index to account for changes in the SVG layer stack order
+- **FR11:** The framework can dispose of a registered WebGL layer and release its associated GPU resources
+
+### Relief Icons Rendering (MVP Layer)
+
+- **FR12:** The system can render all relief icon types from the existing relief atlas texture using instanced rendering in a single GPU draw call
+- **FR13:** The system can position each relief icon at the SVG-space coordinate of its corresponding terrain cell
+- **FR14:** The system can scale each relief icon according to the current map zoom level and the user's configured icon scale setting
+- **FR15:** The system can apply per-icon rotation as defined in the terrain dataset
+- **FR16:** The system can render relief icons with a configurable opacity value
+- **FR17:** The relief layer can re-render when the terrain dataset changes (cells added, removed, or type changed)
+
+### Browser Compatibility & Fallback
+
+- **FR18:** The system can detect when WebGL2 is unavailable in the current browser and automatically fall back to the existing SVG-based relief renderer
+- **FR19:** The SVG fallback renderer produces visually identical output to the WebGL renderer from the user's perspective
+
+### Interaction Preservation
+
+- **FR20:** Users can interact with all SVG map layers (click, drag, hover, editor panels) without the WebGL canvas intercepting pointer or touch events
+- **FR21:** Users can control WebGL-rendered layer visibility and style properties using the existing Layers panel controls with no change to the UI
+
+### Developer Extension API
+
+- **FR22:** A developer can register a new WebGL layer by providing only an anchor SVG layer ID and a render callback — no knowledge of z-index calculation or canvas lifecycle is required
+- **FR23:** A render callback receives the current D3 transform state so it can apply coordinate synchronization without accessing global state
+- **FR24:** A developer can use the same visibility toggle and dispose APIs for custom registered layers as for the built-in relief layer
+
+### Testability
+
+- **FR25:** The coordinate synchronization logic can be exercised in a Vitest unit test by passing a mock D3 transform and asserting the resulting WebGL projection values
+- **FR26:** The WebGL2 fallback detection can be exercised in a Vitest unit test by mocking `canvas.getContext('webgl2')` to return null
+- **FR27:** The layer registration API can be exercised in a Vitest unit test without a real browser WebGL context using a stub renderer
+
+---
+
+## Non-Functional Requirements
+
+### Performance
+
+| NFR    | Requirement                                                              | Measurement Method                                                       |
+| ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| NFR-P1 | Relief layer initial render (1,000 icons) completes in < 16ms            | Vitest benchmark / browser DevTools frame timing                         |
+| NFR-P2 | Relief layer initial render (10,000 icons) completes in < 100ms          | Vitest benchmark / browser DevTools frame timing                         |
+| NFR-P3 | Layer visibility toggle (show/hide) completes in < 4ms                   | `performance.now()` measurement around toggle call                       |
+| NFR-P4 | D3 zoom/pan event → WebGL canvas transform update latency < 8ms          | Measured from zoom event callback to `gl.drawArraysInstanced` completion |
+| NFR-P5 | WebGL context initialization (one-time) completes in < 200ms             | `performance.now()` on first map load                                    |
+| NFR-P6 | No GPU state teardown on layer hide — VBO/texture memory stays allocated | Verified via browser GPU memory profiler (Chrome DevTools Memory panel)  |
+
+### Compatibility
+
+| NFR    | Requirement                                                                                                                                       |
+| ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| NFR-C1 | WebGL2 context (`canvas.getContext('webgl2')`) is the sole gating check; if null, SVG fallback activates automatically with no user-visible error |
+| NFR-C2 | The framework produces identical visual output across Chrome 69+, Firefox 105+, Safari 16.4+, Edge 79+                                            |
+| NFR-C3 | No more than 2 WebGL contexts are open simultaneously (1 for globe, 1 for map) — the browser 8–16 context limit is not approached                 |
+| NFR-C4 | The framework does not break if the user has hardware acceleration disabled (falls back to SVG)                                                   |
+
+### Maintainability & Extensibility
+
+| NFR    | Requirement                                                                                                                                                        |
+| ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| NFR-M1 | The framework core (`WebGL2LayerFramework` class) has no knowledge of any specific layer's content — all layer-specific logic lives in the layer's render callback |
+| NFR-M2 | Adding a new WebGL layer requires only: one call to `framework.register(config)` and implementing the render callback — no changes to framework internals          |
+| NFR-M3 | The TypeScript module follows the existing project Global Module Pattern (`declare global { var WebGL2LayerFramework: ... }`)                                      |
+| NFR-M4 | The coordinate sync formula (D3 transform → WebGL orthographic projection) is documented in code comments with the mathematical derivation                         |
+| NFR-M5 | Vitest unit test coverage ≥ 80% for the framework core module (`src/modules/webgl-layer-framework.ts`)                                                             |
+
+### Bundle Size
+
+| NFR    | Requirement                                                                                                                            |
+| ------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| NFR-B1 | Three.js import uses tree-shaking — only required classes imported (`import { WebGLRenderer, ... } from 'three'`), not the full bundle |
+| NFR-B2 | Total Vite bundle size increase from this feature ≤ 50KB gzipped (Three.js is already a project dependency for the globe view)         |
diff --git a/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/research/technical-WebGL-SVG-layered-rendering-research-2026-03-12.md b/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/research/technical-WebGL-SVG-layered-rendering-research-2026-03-12.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a736c5b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_bmad-output/planning-artifacts/research/technical-WebGL-SVG-layered-rendering-research-2026-03-12.md
@@ -0,0 +1,927 @@
+# Technical Research Report: WebGL + SVG Layered Rendering Architecture
+
+**Date:** 2026-03-12  
+**Project:** Fantasy-Map-Generator  
+**Topic:** Browser compositing strategies for mixing Three.js WebGL and D3 SVG while preserving layer ordering  
+**Status:** Complete
+
+---
+
+## 1. Research Scope
+
+### Problem Statement
+
+The Fantasy-Map-Generator relief icons layer is currently rendered via SVG (slow at scale). The goal is to replace or augment it with Three.js WebGL for GPU-accelerated rendering. Three candidate architectures were identified:
+
+| Option                                 | Description                                                                                                                             | Known Issue                                                                           |
+| -------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **A — Canvas beside SVG**              | `<canvas>` element placed before/after the main SVG element                                                                             | No layer interleaving possible — canvas cannot be interleaved within SVG layer groups |
+| **B — WebGL inside `<foreignObject>`** | Three.js canvas nested inside an SVG `<foreignObject>`                                                                                  | Forces FBO compositing on every frame; slower than pure SVG in practice               |
+| **C — DOM-Split architecture**         | The single SVG is decomposed into multiple sibling DOM elements (canvas + SVG fragments), positioned absolutely and ordered via z-index | A major architectural change that may restore layer interleaving                      |
+
+This report evaluates the browser-level feasibility of Option C and any additional approaches.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Browser Compositing: CSS Stacking Contexts
+
+**Source:** MDN Web Docs — "Stacking context", CSS Compositing specification
+
+### 2.1 What Creates a Stacking Context
+
+Each of the following CSS conditions on an element creates a **stacking context** (a compositing boundary within which children are atomically composed together before being composited with siblings):
+
+| CSS Property / Condition                       | Value                                                                |
+| ---------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| `position` (non-static) + `z-index` (non-auto) | Any `position: relative/absolute/fixed/sticky` with explicit z-index |
+| `opacity`                                      | `< 1`                                                                |
+| `transform`                                    | Any value except `none`                                              |
+| `filter`                                       | Any value except `none`                                              |
+| `backdrop-filter`                              | Any value except `none`                                              |
+| `clip-path`                                    | Any value except `none`                                              |
+| `mask` / `mask-image` / `mask-border`          | Any non-none value                                                   |
+| `mix-blend-mode`                               | Any value except `normal`                                            |
+| `isolation`                                    | `isolate`                                                            |
+| `will-change`                                  | Any value that would create a stacking context if set                |
+| `contain`                                      | `layout`, `paint`, `strict`, or `content`                            |
+| `perspective`                                  | Any value except `none`                                              |
+
+### 2.2 Key Rules for DOM-Split Architecture
+
+1. **Stacking contexts are atomic**: All children of a stacking context are painted together before compositing with sibling stacking contexts. Z-index values are only meaningful within the _same parent_ stacking context.
+2. **Multiple sibling elements** at the same level of the DOM, each with `position: absolute` and different `z-index` values, form a Z-ordered stack — regardless of whether they are SVG, `<canvas>`, or `<div>`.
+3. **`isolation: isolate`** can be used on a wrapper container to explicitly create a stacking context boundary, preventing `mix-blend-mode` from propagating upward and creating predictable compositing behavior.
+4. **`will-change: transform`** hints to the browser compositor that the element should get its own layer. This is useful for canvas elements that update frequently — it avoids invalidating surrounding layers.
+
+### 2.3 Implication for Option C
+
+Option C is **architecturally valid** from the browser stacking context model:
+
+- Each visual "layer" becomes a sibling DOM node at the same ancestry level
+- `position: absolute; inset: 0;` makes all siblings coextensive (covering the same rectangle)
+- `z-index` controls paint order
+- The browser compositor stacks them correctly, regardless of element type
+
+---
+
+## 3. OffscreenCanvas + ImageBitmapRenderingContext
+
+**Source:** MDN Web Docs — OffscreenCanvas API
+
+### 3.1 Status
+
+`OffscreenCanvas` is **Baseline Widely Available** as of 2024:
+
+| Browser | Minimum Version |
+| ------- | --------------- |
+| Chrome  | 69              |
+| Firefox | 105             |
+| Safari  | 16.4            |
+| Edge    | 79              |
+
+### 3.2 Key Patterns
+
+**Pattern A — Worker WebGL → ImageBitmap → Visible Canvas (zero-copy transfer)**
+
+```javascript
+// main thread
+const offscreen = canvas.transferControlToOffscreen();
+const worker = new Worker("relief-worker.js");
+worker.postMessage({canvas: offscreen}, [offscreen]);
+
+// worker thread (relief-worker.js)
+self.onmessage = ({data}) => {
+  const gl = data.canvas.getContext("webgl2");
+  // render loop...
+  // Frames automatically appear on the visible canvas
+};
+```
+
+This pushes the entire WebGL render loop off the main thread. The visible `<canvas>` element stays in the DOM at the correct z-index. The GPU work happens in a Worker.
+
+**Pattern B — OffscreenCanvas + transferToImageBitmap (pull-style)**
+
+```javascript
+// main thread
+const offscreen = new OffscreenCanvas(width, height);
+const gl = offscreen.getContext("webgl2");
+// render into offscreen...
+const bitmap = offscreen.transferToImageBitmap();
+visibleCanvas.getContext("bitmaprenderer").transferFromImageBitmap(bitmap);
+```
+
+This is synchronous on the main thread. The `ImageBitmapRenderingContext` (`bitmaprenderer`) is a lightweight context that just paints a pre-composited bitmap — no per-pixel work on the main thread.
+
+### 3.3 WebGL Best Practices (from research)
+
+- Prefer `webgl2` context
+- Set `alpha: false` **only** if no transparency is needed; `alpha: false` can have a significant performance cost on some GPUs
+- Use `gl.flush()` if rendering without `requestAnimationFrame` (e.g., render-on-demand MapGenerator pattern)
+- Batch draw calls: minimize state changes between draw calls
+- Use `texStorage2D` + `texSubImage2D` for texture atlas uploads
+- Avoid FBO invalidation (the main cost of Option B / `<foreignObject>`)
+
+---
+
+## 4. Three.js Primitives for Relief Icon Rendering
+
+**Source:** Three.js documentation — InstancedMesh, Sprite, CSS2DRenderer, CSS3DRenderer
+
+### 4.1 InstancedMesh
+
+`InstancedMesh(geometry, material, count)` enables drawing N copies of the same geometry in a **single draw call**:
+
+```javascript
+const mesh = new THREE.InstancedMesh(iconGeometry, iconMaterial, maxIcons);
+// Per-instance position/scale/rotation:
+mesh.setMatrixAt(i, matrix); // then mesh.instanceMatrix.needsUpdate = true
+// Per-instance color tint:
+mesh.setColorAt(i, color); // then mesh.instanceColor.needsUpdate = true
+```
+
+Key: The relief icon atlas (a single texture with all icon types as tiles) can be used with `InstancedMesh` where a per-instance attribute selects the UV offset into the atlas. This requires `ShaderMaterial` or `RawShaderMaterial` with custom UV attribute.
+
+### 4.2 Sprite
+
+`Sprite` is always camera-facing (billboard). Accepts `SpriteMaterial` with texture:
+
+```javascript
+const sprite = new THREE.Sprite(new THREE.SpriteMaterial({map: texture}));
+sprite.center.set(0.5, 0.5); // anchor point
+```
+
+Sprites are **per-instance objects** — expensive for thousands of icons. `InstancedMesh` is preferred.
+
+### 4.3 CSS2DRenderer / CSS3DRenderer (Official Three.js Addon)
+
+Three.js has official addon renderers that solve the **inverse problem** (overlaying DOM elements on WebGL):
+
+- `CSS2DRenderer` creates a `<div>` overlay, absolutely positioned, matching the WebGL canvas size
+- `CSS3DObject` / `CSS3DSprite` HTML elements are synced to 3D world-space positions
+- They use the same camera/projection — no manual coordinate mapping needed
+
+**Relevance for Option C**: This pattern reveals that Three.js _already uses_ a multi-layer approach for mixing rendering technologies. The same coordinate synchronization technique can be applied in reverse — syncing multiple sibling DOM elements (canvas layers + SVG layers) to the same logical coordinate space.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Mapbox GL v3 — "Slots" Layer Ordering Pattern
+
+**Source:** Mapbox GL JS v3 migration guide
+
+### 5.1 The Slots Concept
+
+Mapbox GL v3 introduced "slots" as a way to interleave custom layers within a single WebGL render context without splitting the DOM:
+
+```javascript
+map.on("style.load", () => {
+  map.addLayer({id: "my-layer", slot: "middle"});
+  // Slots: 'bottom' | 'middle' | 'top'
+});
+```
+
+Layers are rendered in slot order: all `bottom` layers first, then `middle`, then `top` — within a single WebGL context.
+
+### 5.2 Implications
+
+- This pattern demonstrates that even experts at Mapbox chose a **slot abstraction inside one WebGL context** rather than DOM splitting for their primary layer ordering solution
+- DOM splitting is not used in production WebGL mapping libraries — they manage draw order explicitly within a single WebGL context
+- The slot system is limited to predefined positions (bottom/middle/top) in Mapbox, not arbitrary interleavings
+
+---
+
+## 6. deck.gl — Reactive Layer Architecture
+
+**Source:** deck.gl developer guide — Composite Layers, Layer Extensions
+
+### 6.1 Layer Descriptor Model
+
+deck.gl layers are **cheap, immutable descriptors** — creating a new `Layer` instance does not create GPU resources. The GPU state (buffers, textures, shaders) is managed separately and survives layer re-creation via shallow-diffing of props.
+
+### 6.2 CompositeLayer Pattern
+
+```javascript
+class LabeledIconLayer extends CompositeLayer {
+  renderLayers() {
+    return [
+      new IconLayer({ ...icon props... }),
+      new TextLayer({ ...text props... }),
+    ];
+  }
+}
+```
+
+Composite layers solve the "label + icon" problem (multiple primitives per data point) without DOM involvement.
+
+### 6.3 Layer Extensions
+
+`LayerExtension` injects custom shader code (via GLSL injection hooks) into existing layers without subclassing. This is the mechanism for adding per-biome/per-icon-type shader behavior to an `InstancedMesh`-equivalent layer.
+
+### 6.4 Note on Interleaving
+
+The deck.gl interleaving documentation page (`/docs/developer-guide/interleaving`) returned 404. From context, deck.gl integrates with Mapbox/MapLibre by registering a "custom layer" inside the base map's render loop — meaning deck.gl layers participate in the slot system when `interleaved: true` is passed to the `DeckGL` constructor.
+
+---
+
+## 7. CSS will-change and GPU Compositor Layer Promotion
+
+**Source:** MDN Web Docs — `will-change`
+
+### 7.1 Usage
+
+```css
+.webgl-relief-layer {
+  will-change: transform;
+}
+```
+
+- Hints browser to promote element to its own GPU compositor layer
+- Creates a stacking context (important for z-ordering)
+- **Warning**: Use sparingly — each compositor layer consumes GPU memory
+- Best practice: set via JS immediately before animation/update, remove (set to `auto`) after
+
+### 7.2 Dynamic Application
+
+```javascript
+canvas.style.willChange = "transform";
+// ... perform update ...
+canvas.style.willChange = "auto";
+```
+
+For the FMG use-case (render-on-demand, not continuous animation), manually toggling `will-change` around the render call can reduce compositor overhead.
+
+---
+
+## 8. CSS isolation: isolate
+
+**Source:** MDN Web Docs — `isolation`
+
+```css
+.map-container {
+  isolation: isolate;
+}
+```
+
+- `isolation: isolate` **forces** a new stacking context on the element
+- Baseline Widely Available (Chrome 41+, Safari 8+)
+- Most useful when `mix-blend-mode` is applied to children — `isolation: isolate` on the container prevents blend modes from compositing against elements outside the container
+- For FMG map layers: `isolation: isolate` on the map container prevents any child `mix-blend-mode` (e.g., on the heightmap layer) from bleeding into UI elements outside the map
+
+---
+
+## 9. Alternative Approaches Discovered
+
+Beyond the original three options:
+
+### Option D — Render-to-Texture (Snapshot Pattern)
+
+1. Three.js renders relief icons into a `WebGLRenderTarget` (off-screen FBO)
+2. The FBO texture is exported as `ImageBitmap` using `gl.readPixels` or `THREE.WebGLRenderer.readRenderTargetPixels`
+3. The bitmap is placed into an SVG `
+          </pattern>
+
+          <mask id="vignette-mask">
+            <rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="white"></rect>
+            <rect id="vignette-rect" fill="black"></rect>
           </mask>
+        </defs>
+        <g id="viewbox"></g>
+        <g id="scaleBar">
+          <rect id="scaleBarBack"></rect>
         </g>
-
-        <pattern id="oceanic" width="100" height="100" patternUnits="userSpaceOnUse">
-          <image id="oceanicPattern" href="./images/pattern1.png" opacity="0.2"></image>
-        </pattern>
-
-        <mask id="vignette-mask">
-          <rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" fill="white"></rect>
-          <rect id="vignette-rect" fill="black"></rect>
-        </mask>
-      </defs>
-      <g id="viewbox"></g>
-      <g id="scaleBar">
-        <rect id="scaleBarBack"></rect>
-      </g>
-      <g id="vignette" mask="url(#vignette-mask)">
-        <rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" />
-      </g>
-    </svg>
+        <g id="vignette" mask="url(#vignette-mask)">
+          <rect x="0" y="0" width="100%" height="100%" />
+        </g>
+      </svg>
+      <canvas id="webgl-canvas" aria-hidden style="position: absolute; inset: 0; pointer-events: none"></canvas>
+    </div>
 
     <div id="loading">
       <svg width="100%" height="100%">
@@ -2140,6 +2143,9 @@
             <button id="editProvincesButton" data-tip="Click to open Provinces Editor" data-shortcut="Shift + P">
               Provinces
             </button>
+            <button id="editReliefButton" data-tip="Click to open Relief Icons Editor" onclick="editReliefIcon()">
+              Relief
+            </button>
             <button id="editReligions" data-tip="Click to open Religions Editor" data-shortcut="Shift + R">
               Religions
             </button>
diff --git a/src/modules/emblem/generator.ts b/src/modules/emblem/generator.ts
index 80317ec3..35f8fe89 100644
--- a/src/modules/emblem/generator.ts
+++ b/src/modules/emblem/generator.ts
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ class EmblemGeneratorModule {
 
     // Size selection - must use sequential P() calls to match original behavior
     if (P(0.1)) size = "-small";
-    // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noDuplicateElseIf: <explanation>
+    // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noDuplicateElseIf: sequential probability selection requires repeated else-if with same condition
     else if (P(0.1)) size = "-smaller";
     else if (P(0.01)) size = "-big";
     else if (P(0.005)) size = "-smallest";
@@ -469,11 +469,11 @@ class EmblemGeneratorModule {
       if (P(0.2)) {
         t1 = "gules";
         t2 = "or";
-        // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noDuplicateElseIf: <explanation>
+        // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noDuplicateElseIf: sequential probability selection requires repeated else-if with same condition
       } else if (P(0.2)) {
         t1 = "argent";
         t2 = "sable";
-        // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noDuplicateElseIf: <explanation>
+        // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noDuplicateElseIf: sequential probability selection requires repeated else-if with same condition
       } else if (P(0.2)) {
         t1 = "azure";
         t2 = "argent";
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ class EmblemGeneratorModule {
       if (P(0.3)) {
         t1 = "gules";
         t2 = "argent";
-        // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noDuplicateElseIf: <explanation>
+        // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noDuplicateElseIf: sequential probability selection requires repeated else-if with same condition
       } else if (P(0.3)) {
         t1 = "argent";
         t2 = "sable";
diff --git a/src/modules/index.ts b/src/modules/index.ts
index 787e3989..5998d89a 100644
--- a/src/modules/index.ts
+++ b/src/modules/index.ts
@@ -1,20 +1,22 @@
-import "./voronoi";
-import "./heightmap-generator";
+import "./biomes";
+import "./burgs-generator";
+import "./cultures-generator";
+import "./emblem";
 import "./features";
+import "./fonts";
+import "./heightmap-generator";
+import "./ice";
+import "./lakes";
+import "./markers-generator";
+import "./military-generator";
 import "./names-generator";
 import "./ocean-layers";
-import "./lakes";
+import "./provinces-generator";
+import "./relief-generator";
+import "./religions-generator";
 import "./river-generator";
-import "./burgs-generator";
-import "./biomes";
-import "./cultures-generator";
 import "./routes-generator";
 import "./states-generator";
+import "./voronoi";
+import "./webgl-layer";
 import "./zones-generator";
-import "./religions-generator";
-import "./provinces-generator";
-import "./emblem";
-import "./ice";
-import "./military-generator";
-import "./markers-generator";
-import "./fonts";
diff --git a/src/modules/military-generator.ts b/src/modules/military-generator.ts
index daec9332..398c7d2c 100644
--- a/src/modules/military-generator.ts
+++ b/src/modules/military-generator.ts
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ class MilitaryModule {
       nodes.forEach((node) => {
         tree.remove(node);
         const overlap = tree.find(node.x, node.y, 20);
-        if (overlap && overlap.t && mergeable(node, overlap)) {
+        if (overlap?.t && mergeable(node, overlap)) {
           merge(node, overlap);
           return;
         }
diff --git a/src/modules/provinces-generator.ts b/src/modules/provinces-generator.ts
index 6ad3404d..76ad80a6 100644
--- a/src/modules/provinces-generator.ts
+++ b/src/modules/provinces-generator.ts
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ class ProvinceModule {
           if (singleIsle) return "Island";
           if (isleGroup) return "Islands";
           if (colony) return "Colony";
-          return rw(this.forms["Wild"]);
+          return rw(this.forms.Wild);
         })();
 
         const fullName = `${name} ${formName}`;
diff --git a/src/modules/relief-generator.ts b/src/modules/relief-generator.ts
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9598d73d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/modules/relief-generator.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+import { extent, polygonContains } from "d3";
+import { COLORED_TO_SIMPLE_MAP, VARIANT_RANGES } from "../config/relief-config";
+import {
+  byId,
+  getPackPolygon,
+  minmax,
+  poissonDiscSampler,
+  rand,
+  rn,
+} from "../utils";
+
+export interface ReliefIcon {
+  i: number;
+  icon: string; // e.g. "relief-mount-1"
+  x: number;
+  y: number;
+  s: number; // size (width = height in map units)
+}
+
+export function generateRelief(): ReliefIcon[] {
+  TIME && console.time("generateRelief");
+
+  const cells = pack.cells;
+  const terrain = byId("terrain");
+  if (!terrain) throw new Error("Terrain element not found");
+
+  const set = terrain.getAttribute("set") || "simple";
+  const density = Number(terrain.getAttribute("density")) || 0.4;
+  const size = 2 * (Number(terrain.getAttribute("size")) || 1);
+  const mod = 0.2 * size;
+
+  const reliefIcons: ReliefIcon[] = [];
+
+  for (const i of cells.i) {
+    const height = cells.h[i];
+    if (height < 20 || cells.r[i]) continue;
+    const biome = cells.biome[i];
+    if (height < 50 && biomesData.iconsDensity[biome] === 0) continue;
+
+    const polygon = getPackPolygon(i, pack);
+    const [minX, maxX] = extent(polygon, (p) => p[0]);
+    const [minY, maxY] = extent(polygon, (p) => p[1]);
+    if (
+      minX === undefined ||
+      minY === undefined ||
+      maxX === undefined ||
+      maxY === undefined
+    )
+      continue;
+
+    if (height < 50) {
+      const iconsDensity = biomesData.iconsDensity[biome] / 100;
+      const radius = 2 / iconsDensity / density;
+      if (Math.random() > iconsDensity * 10) continue; // skip very low density icons
+
+      for (const [cx, cy] of poissonDiscSampler(
+        minX,
+        minY,
+        maxX,
+        maxY,
+        radius,
+      )) {
+        if (!polygonContains(polygon, [cx, cy])) continue;
+        let h = (4 + Math.random()) * size;
+        const icon = getBiomeIcon(i, biome);
+        if (icon === "relief-grass-1") h *= 1.2;
+        reliefIcons.push({
+          i: reliefIcons.length,
+          icon,
+          x: rn(cx - h, 2),
+          y: rn(cy - h, 2),
+          s: rn(h * 2, 2),
+        });
+      }
+    } else {
+      const radius = 2 / density;
+      const [icon, h] = getReliefIconForCell(i, height);
+      for (const [cx, cy] of poissonDiscSampler(
+        minX,
+        minY,
+        maxX,
+        maxY,
+        radius,
+      )) {
+        if (!polygonContains(polygon, [cx, cy])) continue;
+        reliefIcons.push({
+          i: reliefIcons.length,
+          icon,
+          x: rn(cx - h, 2),
+          y: rn(cy - h, 2),
+          s: rn(h * 2, 2),
+        });
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  reliefIcons.sort((a, b) => a.y + a.s - (b.y + b.s));
+  pack.relief = reliefIcons;
+
+  TIME && console.timeEnd("generateRelief");
+  return reliefIcons;
+
+  function getReliefIconForCell(
+    cellIndex: number,
+    h: number,
+  ): [string, number] {
+    const temp = grid.cells.temp[pack.cells.g[cellIndex]];
+    const type = h > 70 && temp < 0 ? "mountSnow" : h > 70 ? "mount" : "hill";
+    const iconSize = h > 70 ? (h - 45) * mod : minmax((h - 40) * mod, 3, 6);
+    return [getHref(type, set), iconSize];
+  }
+
+  function getBiomeIcon(cellIndex: number, biome: number): string {
+    const b = biomesData.icons[biome];
+    let type = b[Math.floor(Math.random() * b.length)];
+    const temp = grid.cells.temp[pack.cells.g[cellIndex]];
+    if (type === "conifer" && temp < 0) type = "coniferSnow";
+    return getHref(type, set);
+  }
+}
+
+function getVariant(type: string): number {
+  const range = VARIANT_RANGES[type];
+  return range ? rand(...range) : 2;
+}
+
+function getHref(type: string, set: string): string {
+  if (set === "colored") return `relief-${type}-${getVariant(type)}`;
+  if (set === "gray") return `relief-${type}-${getVariant(type)}-bw`;
+  return `relief-${COLORED_TO_SIMPLE_MAP[type] ?? type}-1`;
+}
+
+window.generateReliefIcons = generateRelief;
+
+declare global {
+  var generateReliefIcons: () => ReliefIcon[];
+}
diff --git a/src/modules/texture-atlas-layer.ts b/src/modules/texture-atlas-layer.ts
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..b02c57d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/modules/texture-atlas-layer.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+import {
+  BufferAttribute,
+  BufferGeometry,
+  DoubleSide,
+  type Group,
+  LinearFilter,
+  LinearMipmapLinearFilter,
+  Mesh,
+  MeshBasicMaterial,
+  SRGBColorSpace,
+  type Texture,
+  TextureLoader,
+} from "three";
+
+export interface AtlasConfig {
+  url: string;
+  ids: string[];
+  cols: number;
+  rows: number;
+}
+
+export interface AtlasItem {
+  icon: string;
+  x: number;
+  y: number;
+  s: number;
+}
+
+export class TextureAtlasLayer {
+  private group: Group | null = null;
+  private readonly textureCache = new Map<string, Texture>();
+  private readonly atlases: Record<string, AtlasConfig>;
+
+  constructor(id: string, atlases: Record<string, AtlasConfig>) {
+    this.atlases = atlases;
+    for (const [atlasId, config] of Object.entries(atlases)) {
+      this.preloadTexture(atlasId, config.url);
+    }
+    WebGLLayer.register({
+      id,
+      setup: (group) => {
+        this.group = group;
+      },
+      dispose: () => {
+        this.disposeAll();
+      },
+    });
+  }
+
+  draw(items: AtlasItem[]) {
+    if (!this.group) return;
+    this.disposeGroup();
+
+    const byAtlas = new Map<string, { item: AtlasItem; tileIndex: number }[]>();
+    for (const item of items) {
+      for (const [atlasId, config] of Object.entries(this.atlases)) {
+        const tileIndex = config.ids.indexOf(item.icon);
+        if (tileIndex === -1) continue;
+        let arr = byAtlas.get(atlasId);
+        if (!arr) {
+          arr = [];
+          byAtlas.set(atlasId, arr);
+        }
+        arr.push({ item, tileIndex });
+        break;
+      }
+    }
+
+    for (const [atlasId, entries] of byAtlas) {
+      const texture = this.textureCache.get(atlasId);
+      const config = this.atlases[atlasId];
+      if (!texture || !config) continue;
+      this.group.add(buildMesh(entries, config, texture));
+    }
+    WebGLLayer.rerender();
+  }
+
+  clear() {
+    this.disposeGroup();
+    WebGLLayer.rerender();
+  }
+
+  private preloadTexture(atlasId: string, url: string) {
+    new TextureLoader().load(
+      url,
+      (texture) => {
+        texture.flipY = false;
+        texture.colorSpace = SRGBColorSpace;
+        texture.needsUpdate = true;
+        texture.minFilter = LinearMipmapLinearFilter;
+        texture.magFilter = LinearFilter;
+        texture.generateMipmaps = true;
+        this.textureCache.set(atlasId, texture);
+      },
+      undefined,
+      () => {
+        ERROR && console.error(`TextureAtlasLayer: failed to load "${url}"`);
+      },
+    );
+  }
+
+  private disposeGroup() {
+    if (!this.group) return;
+    this.group.traverse((obj) => {
+      if (obj instanceof Mesh) {
+        obj.geometry.dispose();
+        (obj.material as MeshBasicMaterial).dispose();
+      }
+    });
+    this.group.clear();
+  }
+
+  private disposeAll() {
+    this.disposeGroup();
+    for (const tex of this.textureCache.values()) tex.dispose();
+    this.textureCache.clear();
+  }
+}
+
+function buildMesh(
+  entries: Array<{ item: AtlasItem; tileIndex: number }>,
+  atlas: AtlasConfig,
+  texture: Texture,
+): Mesh {
+  const { cols, rows } = atlas;
+  const positions = new Float32Array(entries.length * 4 * 3);
+  const uvs = new Float32Array(entries.length * 4 * 2);
+  const indices = new Uint32Array(entries.length * 6);
+
+  let vi = 0,
+    ii = 0;
+  for (const { item: q, tileIndex } of entries) {
+    const col = tileIndex % cols;
+    const row = Math.floor(tileIndex / cols);
+    const u0 = col / cols,
+      u1 = (col + 1) / cols;
+    const v0 = row / rows,
+      v1 = (row + 1) / rows;
+    const x1 = q.x + q.s,
+      y1 = q.y + q.s;
+    const base = vi;
+    positions.set([q.x, q.y, 0], vi * 3);
+    uvs.set([u0, v0], vi * 2);
+    vi++;
+    positions.set([x1, q.y, 0], vi * 3);
+    uvs.set([u1, v0], vi * 2);
+    vi++;
+    positions.set([q.x, y1, 0], vi * 3);
+    uvs.set([u0, v1], vi * 2);
+    vi++;
+    positions.set([x1, y1, 0], vi * 3);
+    uvs.set([u1, v1], vi * 2);
+    vi++;
+    indices.set([base, base + 1, base + 3, base, base + 3, base + 2], ii);
+    ii += 6;
+  }
+
+  const geo = new BufferGeometry();
+  geo.setAttribute("position", new BufferAttribute(positions, 3));
+  geo.setAttribute("uv", new BufferAttribute(uvs, 2));
+  geo.setIndex(new BufferAttribute(indices, 1));
+
+  return new Mesh(
+    geo,
+    new MeshBasicMaterial({
+      map: texture,
+      transparent: true,
+      side: DoubleSide,
+      depthTest: false,
+      depthWrite: false,
+    }),
+  );
+}
diff --git a/src/modules/webgl-layer.ts b/src/modules/webgl-layer.ts
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..89536c3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/modules/webgl-layer.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+import { Group, OrthographicCamera, Scene, WebGLRenderer } from "three";
+import { byId } from "../utils";
+
+export interface WebGLLayerConfig {
+  id: string;
+  setup: (group: Group) => void; // called once after WebGL2 confirmed; add meshes to group
+  render?: (group: Group) => void; // called each frame before renderer.render(); update uniforms/geometry
+  dispose: (group: Group) => void; // called on unregister(); dispose all GPU objects in group
+}
+interface RegisteredLayer {
+  config: WebGLLayerConfig;
+  group: Group;
+}
+
+export class WebGL2LayerClass {
+  private canvas = byId("webgl-canvas")!;
+  private renderer: WebGLRenderer | null = null;
+  private camera: OrthographicCamera | null = null;
+  private scene: Scene | null = null;
+  private layers: Map<string, RegisteredLayer> = new Map();
+  private pendingConfigs: WebGLLayerConfig[] = []; // queue for register() before init()
+  private rafId: number | null = null;
+
+  init(): boolean {
+    this.renderer = new WebGLRenderer({
+      canvas: this.canvas,
+      antialias: false,
+      alpha: true,
+    });
+    this.renderer.setPixelRatio(window.devicePixelRatio || 1);
+    this.canvas.style.width = `${graphWidth}px`;
+    this.canvas.style.height = `${graphHeight}px`;
+    this.renderer.setSize(graphWidth, graphHeight, false);
+    this.scene = new Scene();
+    this.camera = new OrthographicCamera(0, graphWidth, 0, graphHeight, -1, 1);
+
+    // Process pre-init registrations (register() before init() is explicitly safe)
+    for (const config of this.pendingConfigs) {
+      const group = new Group();
+      config.setup(group);
+      this.scene.add(group);
+      this.layers.set(config.id, { config, group });
+    }
+    this.pendingConfigs = [];
+
+    return true;
+  }
+
+  private syncTransform() {
+    if (!this.camera) return;
+    const x = -viewX / scale;
+    const y = -viewY / scale;
+    const w = graphWidth / scale;
+    const h = graphHeight / scale;
+
+    this.camera.left = x;
+    this.camera.right = x + w;
+    this.camera.top = y;
+    this.camera.bottom = y + h;
+    this.camera.updateProjectionMatrix();
+  }
+
+  private render() {
+    if (!this.renderer || !this.scene || !this.camera) return;
+    this.syncTransform();
+    for (const layer of this.layers.values()) {
+      if (layer.group.visible && layer.config.render)
+        layer.config.render(layer.group);
+    }
+    this.renderer.render(this.scene, this.camera);
+  }
+
+  register(config: WebGLLayerConfig) {
+    if (!this.scene) {
+      // init() has not been called yet — queue for processing in init()
+      this.pendingConfigs.push(config);
+      return;
+    }
+
+    // Post-init registration: create group immediately
+    const group = new Group();
+    config.setup(group);
+    this.scene.add(group);
+    this.layers.set(config.id, { config, group });
+  }
+
+  rerender() {
+    if (this.rafId !== null) return;
+    this.rafId = requestAnimationFrame(() => {
+      this.rafId = null;
+      this.render();
+    });
+  }
+}
+
+declare global {
+  var WebGLLayer: WebGL2LayerClass;
+}
+
+window.WebGLLayer = new WebGL2LayerClass();
diff --git a/src/renderers/draw-heightmap.ts b/src/renderers/draw-heightmap.ts
index 7ccabd47..3d181a6c 100644
--- a/src/renderers/draw-heightmap.ts
+++ b/src/renderers/draw-heightmap.ts
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 import type { CurveFactory } from "d3";
-import * as d3 from "d3";
-import { color, line, range } from "d3";
+import {
+  color,
+  curveBasisClosed,
+  curveLinear,
+  curveStep,
+  line,
+  range,
+} from "d3";
 import { round } from "../utils";
 
 declare global {
@@ -28,10 +34,13 @@ const heightmapRenderer = (): void => {
   if (renderOceanCells) {
     const skip = +ocean.attr("skip") + 1 || 1;
     const relax = +ocean.attr("relax") || 0;
-    // TODO: Improve for treeshaking
-    const curveType: keyof typeof d3 = (ocean.attr("curve") ||
-      "curveBasisClosed") as keyof typeof d3;
-    const lineGen = line().curve(d3[curveType] as CurveFactory);
+    const curveFactories: Record<string, CurveFactory> = {
+      curveBasisClosed,
+      curveLinear,
+      curveStep,
+    };
+    const curveType = ocean.attr("curve") || "curveBasisClosed";
+    const lineGen = line().curve(curveFactories[curveType] ?? curveBasisClosed);
 
     let currentLayer = 0;
     for (const i of heights) {
@@ -59,9 +68,13 @@ const heightmapRenderer = (): void => {
   {
     const skip = +land.attr("skip") + 1 || 1;
     const relax = +land.attr("relax") || 0;
-    const curveType: keyof typeof d3 = (land.attr("curve") ||
-      "curveBasisClosed") as keyof typeof d3;
-    const lineGen = line().curve(d3[curveType] as CurveFactory);
+    const curveFactories: Record<string, CurveFactory> = {
+      curveBasisClosed,
+      curveLinear,
+      curveStep,
+    };
+    const curveType = land.attr("curve") || "curveBasisClosed";
+    const lineGen = line().curve(curveFactories[curveType] ?? curveBasisClosed);
 
     let currentLayer = 20;
     for (const i of heights) {
diff --git a/src/renderers/draw-markers.ts b/src/renderers/draw-markers.ts
index edc5befd..55d827db 100644
--- a/src/renderers/draw-markers.ts
+++ b/src/renderers/draw-markers.ts
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ const pinShapes: PinShapes = {
   no: () => "",
 };
 
+// biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noRedeclare: const implementation satisfies the global var declaration above
 const getPin = (shape = "bubble", fill = "#fff", stroke = "#000"): string => {
   const shapeFunction = pinShapes[shape] || pinShapes.bubble;
   return shapeFunction(fill, stroke);
diff --git a/src/renderers/draw-relief-icons.ts b/src/renderers/draw-relief-icons.ts
index c4960b25..cc78135c 100644
--- a/src/renderers/draw-relief-icons.ts
+++ b/src/renderers/draw-relief-icons.ts
@@ -1,164 +1,45 @@
-import { extent, polygonContains } from "d3";
-import { minmax, rand, rn } from "../utils";
+import { RELIEF_ATLASES } from "../config/relief-config";
+import type { ReliefIcon } from "../modules/relief-generator";
+import { generateRelief } from "../modules/relief-generator";
+import { TextureAtlasLayer } from "../modules/texture-atlas-layer";
+import { byId } from "../utils";
 
-interface ReliefIcon {
-  i: string;
-  x: number;
-  y: number;
-  s: number;
+const layer = new TextureAtlasLayer("terrain", RELIEF_ATLASES);
+
+function drawSvg(icons: ReliefIcon[], parentEl: HTMLElement): void {
+  parentEl.innerHTML = icons
+    .map(
+      (r) =>
+        `<use href="#${r.icon}" data-id="${r.i}" x="${r.x}" y="${r.y}" width="${r.s}" height="${r.s}"/>`,
+    )
+    .join("");
 }
 
-declare global {
-  var drawReliefIcons: () => void;
-  var terrain: import("d3").Selection<SVGGElement, unknown, null, undefined>;
-  var getPackPolygon: (i: number) => [number, number][];
-}
+window.drawRelief = (
+  type: "svg" | "webGL" = "webGL",
+  parentEl: HTMLElement | undefined = byId("terrain"),
+) => {
+  if (!parentEl) throw new Error("Relief: parent element not found");
+  parentEl.innerHTML = "";
+  parentEl.dataset.mode = type;
 
-const reliefIconsRenderer = (): void => {
-  TIME && console.time("drawRelief");
-  terrain.selectAll("*").remove();
+  const icons = pack.relief?.length ? pack.relief : generateRelief();
+  if (!icons.length) return;
 
-  const cells = pack.cells;
-  const density = Number(terrain.attr("density")) || 0.4;
-  const size = 2 * (Number(terrain.attr("size")) || 1);
-  const mod = 0.2 * size; // size modifier
-  const relief: ReliefIcon[] = [];
-
-  for (const i of cells.i) {
-    const height = cells.h[i];
-    if (height < 20) continue; // no icons on water
-    if (cells.r[i]) continue; // no icons on rivers
-    const biome = cells.biome[i];
-    if (height < 50 && biomesData.iconsDensity[biome] === 0) continue; // no icons for this biome
-
-    const polygon = getPackPolygon(i);
-    const [minX, maxX] = extent(polygon, (p) => p[0]) as [number, number];
-    const [minY, maxY] = extent(polygon, (p) => p[1]) as [number, number];
-
-    if (height < 50) placeBiomeIcons();
-    else placeReliefIcons();
-
-    function placeBiomeIcons(): void {
-      const iconsDensity = biomesData.iconsDensity[biome] / 100;
-      const radius = 2 / iconsDensity / density;
-      if (Math.random() > iconsDensity * 10) return;
-
-      for (const [cx, cy] of window.poissonDiscSampler(
-        minX,
-        minY,
-        maxX,
-        maxY,
-        radius,
-      )) {
-        if (!polygonContains(polygon, [cx, cy])) continue;
-        let h = (4 + Math.random()) * size;
-        const icon = getBiomeIcon(i, biomesData.icons[biome]);
-        if (icon === "#relief-grass-1") h *= 1.2;
-        relief.push({
-          i: icon,
-          x: rn(cx - h, 2),
-          y: rn(cy - h, 2),
-          s: rn(h * 2, 2),
-        });
-      }
-    }
-
-    function placeReliefIcons(): void {
-      const radius = 2 / density;
-      const [icon, h] = getReliefIcon(i, height);
-
-      for (const [cx, cy] of window.poissonDiscSampler(
-        minX,
-        minY,
-        maxX,
-        maxY,
-        radius,
-      )) {
-        if (!polygonContains(polygon, [cx, cy])) continue;
-        relief.push({
-          i: icon,
-          x: rn(cx - h, 2),
-          y: rn(cy - h, 2),
-          s: rn(h * 2, 2),
-        });
-      }
-    }
-
-    function getReliefIcon(cellIndex: number, h: number): [string, number] {
-      const temp = grid.cells.temp[pack.cells.g[cellIndex]];
-      const type = h > 70 && temp < 0 ? "mountSnow" : h > 70 ? "mount" : "hill";
-      const iconSize = h > 70 ? (h - 45) * mod : minmax((h - 40) * mod, 3, 6);
-      return [getIcon(type), iconSize];
-    }
-  }
-
-  // sort relief icons by y+size
-  relief.sort((a, b) => a.y + a.s - (b.y + b.s));
-
-  const reliefHTML: string[] = [];
-  for (const r of relief) {
-    reliefHTML.push(
-      `<use href="${r.i}" x="${r.x}" y="${r.y}" width="${r.s}" height="${r.s}"/>`,
-    );
-  }
-  terrain.html(reliefHTML.join(""));
-
-  TIME && console.timeEnd("drawRelief");
-
-  function getBiomeIcon(cellIndex: number, b: string[]): string {
-    let type = b[Math.floor(Math.random() * b.length)];
-    const temp = grid.cells.temp[pack.cells.g[cellIndex]];
-    if (type === "conifer" && temp < 0) type = "coniferSnow";
-    return getIcon(type);
-  }
-
-  function getVariant(type: string): number {
-    switch (type) {
-      case "mount":
-        return rand(2, 7);
-      case "mountSnow":
-        return rand(1, 6);
-      case "hill":
-        return rand(2, 5);
-      case "conifer":
-        return 2;
-      case "coniferSnow":
-        return 1;
-      case "swamp":
-        return rand(2, 3);
-      case "cactus":
-        return rand(1, 3);
-      case "deadTree":
-        return rand(1, 2);
-      default:
-        return 2;
-    }
-  }
-
-  function getOldIcon(type: string): string {
-    switch (type) {
-      case "mountSnow":
-        return "mount";
-      case "vulcan":
-        return "mount";
-      case "coniferSnow":
-        return "conifer";
-      case "cactus":
-        return "dune";
-      case "deadTree":
-        return "dune";
-      default:
-        return type;
-    }
-  }
-
-  function getIcon(type: string): string {
-    const set = terrain.attr("set") || "simple";
-    if (set === "simple") return `#relief-${getOldIcon(type)}-1`;
-    if (set === "colored") return `#relief-${type}-${getVariant(type)}`;
-    if (set === "gray") return `#relief-${type}-${getVariant(type)}-bw`;
-    return `#relief-${getOldIcon(type)}-1`; // simple
+  if (type === "svg") {
+    drawSvg(icons, parentEl);
+  } else {
+    layer.draw(icons);
   }
 };
 
-window.drawReliefIcons = reliefIconsRenderer;
+window.undrawRelief = () => {
+  layer.clear();
+  const terrainEl = byId("terrain");
+  if (terrainEl) terrainEl.innerHTML = "";
+};
+
+declare global {
+  var drawRelief: (type?: "svg" | "webGL", parentEl?: HTMLElement) => void;
+  var undrawRelief: () => void;
+}
diff --git a/src/types/PackedGraph.ts b/src/types/PackedGraph.ts
index b8749f0a..0eb7fdeb 100644
--- a/src/types/PackedGraph.ts
+++ b/src/types/PackedGraph.ts
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ import type { Burg } from "../modules/burgs-generator";
 import type { Culture } from "../modules/cultures-generator";
 import type { PackedGraphFeature } from "../modules/features";
 import type { Province } from "../modules/provinces-generator";
+import type { ReliefIcon } from "../modules/relief-generator";
 import type { River } from "../modules/river-generator";
 import type { Route } from "../modules/routes-generator";
 import type { State } from "../modules/states-generator";
@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ export interface PackedGraph {
     p: [number, number][]; // vertex points
   };
   rivers: River[];
+  relief: ReliefIcon[];
   features: PackedGraphFeature[];
   burgs: Burg[];
   states: State[];
diff --git a/src/types/global.ts b/src/types/global.ts
index 371dd583..d3fb3f0a 100644
--- a/src/types/global.ts
+++ b/src/types/global.ts
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ declare global {
   var unlock: (settingId: string) => void;
   var $: (selector: any) => any;
   var scale: number;
+  var viewX: number;
+  var viewY: number;
   var changeFont: () => void;
   var getFriendlyHeight: (coords: [number, number]) => string;
 }
diff --git a/src/utils/graphUtils.ts b/src/utils/graphUtils.ts
index 9b297b41..cf1e43ae 100644
--- a/src/utils/graphUtils.ts
+++ b/src/utils/graphUtils.ts
@@ -440,7 +440,10 @@ export const findAllCellsInRadius = (
  * @param {number} i - The index of the packed cell
  * @returns {Array} - An array of polygon points for the specified cell
  */
-export const getPackPolygon = (cellIndex: number, packedGraph: any) => {
+export const getPackPolygon = (
+  cellIndex: number,
+  packedGraph: any,
+): [number, number][] => {
   return packedGraph.cells.v[cellIndex].map(
     (v: number) => packedGraph.vertices.p[v],
   );